The opportunities and challenges of institutional arrangement for Besuki Na-Oogst Tobacco cultivation business: case study in Jember Regency Indonesia

Adhitya Wardhono, Josi Ali Arifandi, Yulia Indrawati

Abstract


Purpose. This research aims at formulating the development strategy for institutional pattern amongst the stakeholders and the policy makers for Besuki Na-Oogst Tobacco in Jember Regency.

Methodology / approach. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Qualitative Descriptive are applied to obtain and elaborate the perception of all stakeholders related to Besuki Na-Oogst Tobacco Institution in Jember Regency. Samples are collected by using in-depth interview and focus group discussion involving farmer groups, exporters, and policy makers (government).

Results. The analysis indicates that the main factor which becomes the priority for developing the institution for Besuki Na-Oogst Tobacco Cultivation is access to all stakeholders, amongst farmers, exporters and policy makers.

Originality / scientific novelty. The access to information and technology becomes crucial to increase productivity, the quality, and the sustainability of Besuki Na-Oogst Tobacco.

Practical value / implications. The effectiveness and the sustainability of producers as well as the institutional arrangement with market players and the policy makers are the result of the Besuki Na-Oogst Tobacco stakeholders’ relation, which are bonding, bridging and linking. These are essential in the access to national and international market and also yield a positive sum game to cooperate, reach and increase profit as well as share advantages and loss.


Keywords


Institutional; Arrangement; Besuki Na-Oogst Tobacco.

Full Text:

PDF

References


The official site of FAO (2017), available at: http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx.

Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan (2015), Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia Komoditas Tembakau 2014–2016. Jakarta, Indonesia.

Utami, S. W., Daryanto, A. and Rujito, H. (2014), Strategi Peningkatan Daya Saing Tembakau Besuki Na-Ooogst Berbasis Perbaikan Kinerja Mutu. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 100–109.

Qiu, H. G., Wang, X. B., Zhang, C. P. and Xu, X. G. (2016), Farmers’ seed choice behaviors under asymmetrical information: Evidence from maize farming in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, vol. 15, is. 8, pp. 1915–1923. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61326-0.

Leonard, D. K., Bloom, G., Hanson, K., O’Farrell, J. and Spicer, N. (2013), Institutional Solutions to the Asymmetric Information Problem in Health and Development Services for the Poor. World Development, vol. 48, pp. 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.04.003.

Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill Inc. News York, USA.

Hai-Sheng, C., Guo-Shun, L. I. U., Yong-Feng, Y., Xie-Feng, Y. E. and Zhou, S. H. I. (2010), Comprehensive Evaluation of Tobacco Ecological Suitability of Henan Province Based on GIS. Agricultural Sciences in China, vol. 9, is. 4, pp. 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60132-2.

Meng, C., Xu, D., Son, Y., Kubota, C., Lewis, M. and Tronstad, R. (2014), An integrated simulation and AHP approach to vegetable grafting operation design. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 102, pp. 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.01.007.

Chavez, M. D., Berentsen, P. B. M. and Lansink, A. G. J. M. (2012), Assessment of criteria and farming activities for tobacco diversification using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique. Agricultural Systems, vol. 111, pp. 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.05.006.

Zhang, J., Su, Y., Wu, J. and Liang, H. (2015), GIS based land suitability assessment for tobacco production using AHP and fuzzy set in Shandong province of China. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 114, pp. 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.04.004.

Hauser, M., Lindtner, M., Prehsler, S. and Probst, L. (2016), Farmer participatory research : Why extension workers should understand and facilitate farmers’ role transitions. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 47, part A, pp. 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.007.

Wardhono, A., Arifandi, J. and Indrawati, Y. (2018), The dynamics of institutional arrangement for improving export competitiveness of Besuki Na-Oogst Tobacco in Jember Regency Indonesia. UNEJ e-Proceeding, [S.l.], pp. 109–115.

Negri, M. and Porto, G. G. (2016), Burley tobacco clubs in Malawi : Nonmarket institutions for exports. International Economics, vol. 146, pp. 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2015.11.004.

Minet, J., Curnel, Y., Gobin, A., Goffart, J., Mélard, F., Tychon, B. and Defourny, P. (2017), Crowdsourcing for agricultural applications : A review of uses and opportunities for a farmsourcing approach. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 142, part A, pp. 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.08.026.

Muchfirodin, M., Guritno, A. D. and Yuliando, H. (2015), Supply Chain Risk Management on Tobacco Commodity in Temanggung, Central Java (Case study at Farmers and Middlemen Level). Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, vol. 3, pp. 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.01.046.

Orr, A. (2000), Green Gold?: Burley Tobacco, Smallholder Agriculture, and Poverty Alleviation in Malawi. World Development, vol. 28, is. 2, pp. 347–363.

Maredia, M. K., Shankar, B., Kelley, T. G. and Stevenson, J. R. (2014), Impact assessment of agricultural research, institutional innovation, and technology adoption: introduction to the special section. Food Policy, vol. 44, pp. 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.10.001.

Pratt, C. B. (2011), China’s tobacco industry’s communication practices: Paradoxes and proposals for public policymaking. Public Relations Review, vol. 37, is. 3, pp. 318–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.010.

Biesenthal, C., Clegg, S., Mahalingam, A. and Sankaran, S. (2017), Applying institutional theories to managing megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management, vol. 36, is. 1, pp. 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.06.006.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licens 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

 

© Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 2015–2018.