Business expectations as indicators of production constraints in agriculture

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2025.11.03.11

Keywords:

agribusiness, agricultural enterprises, farmers’ expectations, latent barriers, business development, farmers’ behaviour, perception, agricultural policy, Russian-Ukrainian war.

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to identify latent indicators derived from business expectations of agricultural enterprises regarding production barriers (obstacles) and to assess their impact on agricultural output dynamics.

Methodology / approach. The principal components analysis (PCA) method was applied to reduce dimensionality and eliminate multicollinearity among independent variables and to aggregate subjective assessments of production barriers reported by agricultural producers. Regression and correlation analysis are used to examine the direction and strength of relationships between the principal components and production volumes. The data are from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine for 2015–2024.

Results. Two latent components (PC1, PC2) summarising the structure of production barriers were identified. The principal components reflect the opposite poles of farmers’ expectations: on the one hand, financial and material constraints, and on the other, the absence of constraints. This confirms that business expectations can be reduced to integrated latent dimensions that summarise the presence or absence of barriers to production. PC1 and PC2 revealed a strong positive statistically significant relationship with actual production volumes, which indicates their significance as aggregate indicators of business assessments. At the same time, the negative insignificant correlation of PC1 with production in constant prices affects the ambivalence of its interpretation, since its structure simultaneously contains the influence of both favourable and restrictive factors. Additional components (such as PC7) demonstrated a higher significant correlation with production volumes in constant prices than the leading components. This means that secondary, less dispersion-significant latent factors may be more informative for explaining the dynamics of production volume in constant prices. The business expectation system in agriculture has a multidimensional nature, where key barriers and incentives do not always coincide with the most variable factors, but may have greater predictive value for assessing future production.

Originality / scientific novelty. The study presents a novel combination of PCA and regression analyse for interpreting business expectations as a latent indicator of production conditions. The scientific contribution lies in identifying latent indicators of subjective evaluations that are statistically linked to real production outcomes, even in the absence of direct objective measurements.

Practical value / implications. The results can be used to develop a risk monitoring system in agriculture based on aggregated indicators. This approach improves the accuracy of assessing sectoral conditions and contributes to the development of more targeted agricultural policies, aimed both at overcoming critical barriers and enhancing adaptive capacity of producers.

References

Abid, M., Scheffran, J., Schneider, U. A., & Elahi, E. (2019). Farmer perceptions of climate change, observed trends and adaptation of agriculture in Pakistan. Environmental Management, 63, 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1113-7

Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: how human psychology drives the economy and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton, Princeton University Press. Available at: https://altexploit.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/shiller-robert-j-_-akerlof-george-a-animal-spirits-_-how-human-psychology-drives-the-economy-and-why-it-matters-for-global-capitalism-new-edition-princeton-university-press-201020.pdf

Altarawneh, M. (2016). Determine the barriers of organic agriculture implementation in Jordan. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 22(1), 10–15. Available at: https://www.agrojournal.org/22/01-02.pdf

Anglin, A. H., McKenny, A. F., & Short, J. C. (2018). The impact of collective optimism on new venture creation and growth: a social contagion perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 42(3), 390–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12256

Aonngernthayakorn, K., & Pongquan, S. (2017). Determinants of rice farmers’ utilization of agricultural information in Central Thailand. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 18(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2016.1247001

Apipoonyanon, C., Szabo, S., Tsusaka, T. W., Leeson, K., Gunawan, E., & Kuwornu, J. K. (2020). Socio-economic and environmental barriers to increased agricultural production: new evidence from central Thailand. Outlook on Agriculture, 50(2), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727020967361

Bachmann, R., Elstner, S., & Sims, E. R. (2013). Uncertainty and economic activity: evidence from business survey data. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 5(2), 217–249. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.5.2.217

Baldwin, C. Y., Bogers, M. L. A. M., Kapoor, R., & West, J. (2024). Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies. Research Policy, 53(3), 104949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104949

Barnett, V. (2017). Keynes, animal spirits, and instinct: reason plus intuition is better than rational. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 39(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837216000274

Barrett, C. B., Carter, M. R., & Timmer, C. P. (2010). A century-long perspective on agricultural development. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92(2), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaq005

Bartholomew, D. J., Knott, M., & Moustaki, I. (2011). Latent variable models and factor analysis: a unified approach (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119970583

Binswanger-Mkhize, H. P., & McCalla, A. F. (2009). The changing context and prospects for agricultural and rural development in Africa. Rome, International Fund for Agricultural Development. Available at: https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714182/39711263/annex1.pdf/6890fee4-f624-4679-b129-4ce01d7f49bd

Birol, Ö. H. (2013). “Adaptive expectations” of Milton Friedman and monetarists and Phillips Curve; and the comparison of them with other macroeconomic schools. GSTF Journal on Business Review (GBR), 3, 8. https://doi.org/10.7603/s40706-013-0008-0

Bookstaber, R., & Kirman, A. (2018). Modeling a heterogeneous world. In C. Hommes, B. LeBaron (Eds.)., Handbook of Computational Economics (pp. 769–795), vol. 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hescom.2018.03.004

Bruce, A., Neidecker, E., Zheng, L., Leslie, I. S., & Wilhelm, A. (2025). “A farm is viable if it can keep its head above water”: defining and measuring farm viability for small and mid-sized farms. Agriculture and Human Values, 42, 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10687-9

Chapman, M., Wiltshire, S., Baur, P., Bowles, T., Carlisle, L., Castillo, F., Esquivel, K., ... & Boettiger, C. (2022). Social-ecological feedbacks drive tipping points in farming system diversification. One Earth, 5(3), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.007

Chowdhury, M. A. F., Abdullah, M., Islam, Md. R., & Nirjon, N. A. (2024). Nonlinear and threshold effect of corporate social responsibility on bank performance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2024.2378368

Ciccarone, G., Giuli, F., & Marchetti, E. (2020). Prospect theory and sentiment-driven fluctuations. The B. E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 20(1), 20170118. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2017-0118

Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., & Kumar, S. (2018). How do firms form their expectations? New survey evidence. American Economic Review, 108(9), 2671–2713. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151299

Constantinides, G. M., Montone, M., Potì, V., & Spilioti, S. (2023). Sentiment, productivity, and economic growth. Working Paper No. 2023-40. Available at: https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/BFI_WP_2023-40.pdf

da Silveira, F., Barbedo, J. G. A., da Silva, S. L. C., & Gonçalves Amaral, F. G. (2023). Proposal for a framework to manage the barriers that hinder the development of agriculture 4.0 in the agricultural production chain. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 214, 108281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108281

Das, A., Roy Chaudhuri, H., & Edwards, L. (2023). Communication in global crises: critical discourses on consumption, culture, power, and resistance. Consumption Markets & Culture, 26(3), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2023.2221178

Daugaard, D., Kent, D., Servátka, M., & Zhang, L. (2024). Optimistic framing increases responsible investment of investment professionals. Scientific Reports, 14, 583. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50965-w

De Grauwe, P., & Ji, Y. (2016). Animal spirits and the international transmission of business cycles. CESifo Working Paper No. 5810. Available at: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp5810.pdf

Dessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & van Bavel, R. (2019). Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 417–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019

Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7sncv

European Commission (2021). EU agricultural outlook for markets, income and environment 2021–2031. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-01/agricultural-outlook-2021-report_en_0.pdf

Evans, G. W., & Honkapohja, S. (2001). Learning and expectations in macroeconomics. Princeton, Oxford, Princeton University Press. Available at: http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/13073/1/286%20.%20George_W._Evans%2C.pdf

Gennaioli, N., Ma, Y., & Shleifer, A. (2016). Expectations and investment. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 30(1), 379–431. https://doi.org/10.1086/685965

Greenacre, M., Groenen, P. J. F., Hastie, T., D’Enza, A. I., Markos, A., & Tuzhilina, E. (2022). Principal component analysis. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2, 100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00184-w

Hazell, P., Poulton, C., Wiggins, S., & Dorward, A. (2010). The future of small farms: trajectories and policy priorities. World Development, 38(10), 1349–1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.012

Hendry, D., & Mizon, G. (2010). On the mathematical basis of inter-temporal optimization. Discussion Paper Series No. 497. Oxford, University of Oxford. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46450711

Hernandez, M A., Alarcon, C., Berrospi, M. L., Lopera, D., Quintero, D., Reyes, B., & Olivet, F. (2023). Cultural and economic barriers and opportunities for the participation of women in agricultural production systems: a case study in Guatemala. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1185756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1185756

Higgs, R. (1987). Crisis and leviathan. New York, Oxford University Press. Available at: https://archive.org/details/crisisleviathanc0000higg/page/n7/mode/2up

Hommes, C. (2013). Behavioral rationality and heterogeneous expectations in complex economic systems. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094276

Horwitz, S., & McPhillips, M. J. (2013). The reality of the wartime economy: more historical evidence on Whether World War II ended the great depression. The Independent Review, 17(3), 325–347. Available at: https://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_17_03_01_horwitz.pdf

James, H. S., Hendrickson, M., & Sanders, C. (2021). Fairness perceptions and expectations in agriculture: lessons from the case of Dicamba. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3801081

Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis, 2nd ed. New York, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b98835

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. New Delhi, Atlantic Publishers & Distributors. Available at: https://books.google.bg/books/about/The_General_Theory_of_Employment_Interes.html?id=xpw-96rynOcC&redir_esc=y

Kirman, A. (2021). Rational expectations in a changing world. Revue d’économie Politique, 131(3), 485–510. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27226986

Kuehne, G., Llewellyn, R., Pannell, D. J., Wilkinson, R., Dolling, P., Ouzman, J., & Ewing, M. (2017). Predicting farmer uptake of new agricultural practices: a tool for research, extension and policy. Agricultural Systems, 156, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.06.007

Lucas, R. E. (1972). Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory, 4(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1

Mahn, D., Wang, C., Kent, D., & Heaton, C. (2024). The optimism effect on country productivity and innovation activities. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100565

Mankiw, N. G., & Reis, R. (2002). Sticky information versus sticky prices: a proposal to replace the new Keynesian Phillips curve. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1295–1328. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935034

Nguyen, C. V., Abwao, M., Nguyen, H. V., & Hoang, H. D. (2023). Barriers to agricultural products diversification: an empirical analysis from lotus farming in Central Vietnam. Rural Sustainability Research, 50(345), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.2478/plua-2023-0020

OECD/FAO (2024). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2024–2033. Paris, Rome. https://doi.org/10.1787/4c5d2cfb-en

Ojo, T. O., & Baiyegunhi, L. J. S. (2020). Determinants of credit constraints and its impact on the adoption of climate change adaptation strategies among rice farmers in South-West Nigeria. Economic Structures, 9, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-020-00204-6

Reis, R. (2006). Inattentive consumers. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(8), 1761–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.03.001

Rotaru, A.-S., Pop, I. D., Vatcă, A., & Cioban, A. (2012). Usefulness of Principal components analysis in agriculture. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Horticulture, 69(2), 1843–5394. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311740363

Samian, M., Nadery Mahdei, K., Saadi, H., Ansari, E., Asadi, M., & Mardani, Y. (2012). Educational, social, economical barriers of organic agriculture implementation. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems, 2(4), 165–170. Available at: https://journals.iau.ir/article_517511_99f99259838d4ab5adb5eceabec48bbc.pdf

Sims, C. A. (2003). Implications of rational inattention. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(3), 665–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00029-1

Sorić, P., Škrabić Perić, B., & Matošec, M. (2022). Breaking new grounds: a fresh insight into the leading properties of business and consumer survey indicators. Quality & Quantity, 56, 4511–4535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01306-4

State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2025a). Agricultural production in 2021 constant prices 2024 (during 2015–2024). Available at: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2017/sg/pro_sg/arch_pro_sg_p.htm

State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2025b). Expectations of agricultural enterprises regarding the development of their business activity (during 2015–2024). Available at: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2024/fin/rp/selo/arj_selo_e_2025.html

State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2025c). Value of output of business entities by type of economic activity in regions in 2014–2023. Available at: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/menu/menu_u/sze_20.htm

Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2002). Forecasting using principal components from a large number of predictors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(460), 1167–1179. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3085839

Svobodová, H., & Věžník, A. (2011). Impacts of the common agricultural policy of the European Union in the Vysočina region (Czech Republic) by the view of the farmers. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 12(4), 726–736. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/12.4.982

Tkacova, A., & Gavurova, B. (2023). Economic sentiment indicators and their prediction capabilities in business cycles of EU countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(3), 977–1008. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.029

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1738360

Valtiala, J. (2020). Testing for regime-switching behaviour in Finnish agricultural land prices. Agricultural Finance Review, 81(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-03-2020-0037

Vereda, L., Savignon, J., & da Silva, T. G. (2021). A new method to assess the degree of information rigidity using fixed-event forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(4), 1576–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.03.001

Woodford, M. (2003). Imperfect common knowledge and the effects of monetary policy. Working Paper 8673. Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8673

World Bank (2022). Ukraine rapid damage and needs assessment: February 2022 – February 2023. Washington, D.C, World Bank Group. Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099184503212328877/pdf/P1801740d1177f03c0ab180057556615497.pdf

Wuepper, D., Henzmann, S., & Finger, R. (2023). Measuring farmer time preferences: A systematic literature review for Europe and North America. Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, 2(4), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaa2.97

Downloads

Published

2025-09-20

How to Cite

Shkvarchuk, L., Slav’yuk, R., & Kucher, L. (2025). Business expectations as indicators of production constraints in agriculture. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 11(3), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2025.11.03.11

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>