Formation of communities ancestral estate as foundation of rural development in the context of authority decentralization
Abstract
This paper describes alternative settlement as a system of socio-economic and environmental development of rural areas. It also describes the Ancestral Estate as a phenomenon of balanced self-development of territorial communities, which is widespread in Ukraine. Similarly to the condensation of vapor and dew formation, the passing of new ideas in the society’s consciousness has signs of concentration and the transition of quantitative changes to qualitative ones: the growth of accumulated energy leads to their transformation to a new qualitative basis. Therefore, promotion of social ideas implemented through the following algorithm: informative and explanatory work; the perception and acceptance of an idea by society; formation of a sustainable basis for the realized idea; systematic implementation of idea as a generally accepted by society; management and control of the process, on the part of realized idea reaches, its maximum; output of the idea to a qualitatively new level; formation of a new stage in the cycle of evolutionary ascent.
References
Список використаних джерел
Стратегія сталого розвитку «Україна – 2020» [Електронний ресурс] : Указ Президента України № 5/2015, поточна редакція від 12.01.2015 р. // Урядовий кур’єр. – 2015. – № 6. – 15 січ. – Режим доступу : http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5/2015.
Сільська громада та соціоекономічний розвиток села / О. М. Бородіна, І. В. Прокопа, В. В. Юрчишин та ін. // Соціоекономічний розвиток сільського господарства і села : сучасний вимір ; за ред. чл.-кор. НАН України О. М. Бородіної. – К., НАН України, Ін-т екон. та прогнозув. – 2012. – С. 178–213.
Прокопа І. В. Зміни у підходах до життєзабезпечення на селі : від патерналізму до партнерства з участю громад / І. В. Прокопа // Політика сільського розвитку на базі громад в Україні : наук. доповідь ; за ред. чл.-кор. НАН України О. М. Бородіної, чл.-кор. НААН України І. В. Прокопи, д-ра екон. наук О. Л. Попової. – К., НАН України, Ін-т екон. та прогнозув. – 2015. – С. 32–37.
Huysman M. Knowledge Sharing, Communities, and Social Capital / M. Huysman // Communities of Practice : A Special Issue of Trends in Communication. – 2014. – Рр. 77–100.
Dax Th. The Leader programme 2007–2013 : Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland / Dax Th. et al. // European Urban and Regional Studies. – 2016. – Vol. 23 (1). – Pр. 56–68.
Neumeier S. Social innovation in rural development: identifying the key factors of success / S. Neumeier // The geographical journal. – 2017. – Vol. 183 (1). – Pр. 34–46.
Croft J. Dragon Dreaming design projects [Electronic resource] / J. Croft. – Mode of access : http://www.dragondreaming.org.
Гессманн Х.-В. Концепция не насильственного общения М. Розенберга / Х.-В. Гессманн, П. С. Севастьянов // Современная зарубежная психология. – 2014. – № 2. – С. 84–91.
Rosenberg Marschall B. Umgang mit Angriffen von aggressiven Gesprachspartnern [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access : http://arbeitsblaetter.s tangl6taller.at/KOMMUNIKA6TION/Umgang6mit6Aggression.shtml.
Scharmer C. O. Theory U: Leading from the Future as it Emerges The Social Technology of Presencing / C. O. Scharmer. – The Shambhala Institute for Authentic Leadership. – Fieldnotes, 2006. – Рр. 1–13.
Heron J. The Complete Facilitator’s / J. Heron. – London : Kogan Page, 1999. – 428 p.
Peck M. S. The Different Drum : Community Making and Peace / M. S. Peck. – New York : Simon & Schuster, 1988. – 336 p.
Holmberg S. Boiling Points: The Inextricable Links Between Inequality and Climate Change [Electronic resource] / S. Holmberg. – Mode of access : http://rooseveltinstitute.org/boiling-points.
Boyce J. K. Limits to Growth – Of What? Triple Crisis: Global Perspectives on Finance, Development, and Environment [Electronic resource] / J. K. Boyce. – Mode of access : http://triplecrisis.com/limits-to-growth-of-what.
Mikkelson G. Economic Inequality Predicts Biodiversity Loss [Electronic resource] / G. Mikkelson, A. Gonzalez, G. Peterson. – PLoS ONE. – 2007. – № 2(5). – р. 444. – Mode of access : http://journals.plos.org/plo sone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000444.
Plotnikova M. Innovative character of rural territories social potential realization / M. Plotnikova // Management Theory And Studies For Rural Business And Infrastructure Development. – 2014. – № 36(4). – Рр. 956–958.
Rural business and it’s infrastructure manegement in Ukraine / E. Khodakivsky, Yu. Bogoyavlenska, M. Plotnikova, S. Tyschenko // Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development. – 2009. – Nr. 17(2). – Рр. 147–156.
Bogoyavlenska Yu. The modern social and economic policy of Ukraine: problems of providing for and enhancing of adequate living standards and quality of life / Yu. Bogoyavlenska, M. Plotnikova, E. Khodakivsky // Management theory and studies for rural business and infrastructure development. – 2010. – № 21(2). – Рр. 18–26.
Gilman R. The Eco-village Challenge. The challenge of developing a community living in balanced harmony – with itself as well as nature – is tough, but attainable [Electronic resource] / R. Gilman // Context Institute. Catalyzing a graceful transition to the Planetary Era, 2013. – Mode of access : http://www. context.org/iclib/ic29/gilman1/.
Official site of Global Ecovilladg Network (GEN). – [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access : http://gen.ecovillage.org.
Плотнікова М. Ф. Багатофункціональний підхід в управлінні сільським розвитком в умовах глобалізації / М. Ф. Плотнікова // Продуктивність агропромислового виробництва. Економічні науки. – 2014. – № 26. – С. 140–151.
References
Decree of the President of Ukraine (2015), Strategy for sustainable development «Ukraine – 2020», available at : http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/s how/5/2015.
Borodina, O. M., Prokopa, I. V., Yurchishin, V. V. et al. (2012), Silska hromada ta sotsioekonomichnyi rozvytok sela [Rural Community and Socio-Economic Development of the Village] in Socio-Economic Development of Agriculture and the Village: Modern Dimension, ed Borodina O. M. NAS Ukraine, Institute of Economics and Forecasting, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Prokopa, I. V. (2015), Zminy u pidkhodakh do zhyttiezabezpechennia na seli: vid paternalizmu do partnerstva z uchastiu hromad [Changes in approaches to livelihoods in rural areas: from paternalism to partnership with community participation] in Rural Development Policies on the Basis of Communities in Ukraine, eds Borodina O. M., Prokopa I. V., Popova O. L. Institute of Economics and Forecasting, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Huysman, M. (2014), Knowledge Sharing, Communities, and Social Capital. Communities of Practice: A Special Issue of Trends in Communication, pp. 77–100.
Dax, Th. (2016), The Leader programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 23, is. 1, pp. 56–68.
Neumeier, S. (2017), Social innovation in rural development: identifying the key factors of success. The Geographical Journal, vol. 183, is. 1, pp. 34–46.
Croft, J. (2017), Dragon Dreaming design projects, available at: http://www.dragondreaming.org/.
Gessmann, J. V., Sevastyanov, P. S. (2014), The Concept of Non-Violent Communication by M. Rosenberg. Modern foreign psychology, vol. 2, pp. 84–91.
Rosenberg, M. B. (2012), Umgang mit Angriffen von aggressiven Gesprachspartnern, available at: http://arbeitsblaetter.stangl-taller.at/KOMMUNIKA TION/Umgang-mit-Aggression.shtml.
Scharmer, C. O. (2006), Theory U: Leading from the Future as it Emerges The Social Technology of Presencing, The Shambhala Institute for Authentic Leadership, Fieldnotes, USA.
Heron, J. (1999), The Complete Facilitator’s, Kogan Page, London, UK.
Peck, M. S. (1988), The Different Drum: Community Making and Peace, Simon & Schuster, New York, USA.
Holmberg, S. (2017), Boiling Points: The Inextricable Links Between Inequality and Climate Change, available at: http://rooseveltinstitute.org/boiling-points/
Boyce, J. K. (2013), Limits to Growth – Of What? Triple Crisis: Global Perspectives on Finance, Development, and Environment, available at: http://triplecrisis.com/limi ts-to-growth-of-what.
Mikkelson, G., Gonzalez, A., Peterson, G. (2007), Economic Inequality Predicts Biodiversity Loss, [Online], vol. 2(5), available at: http://journals.plos.org/ploso ne/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000444.
Plotnikova, M. (2014), Innovative character of rural territories social potential realization. Management Theory And Studies For Rural Business And Infrastructure Development, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 956–958.
Khodakivsky, E., Bogoyavlenska, Yu., Plotnikova, M., Tyschenko, S. (2009), Rural business and it’s infrastructure manegement in Ukraine. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 147–156.
Bogoyavlenska, Yu., Plotnikova, M., Khodakivsky, E. (2010), The modern social and economic policy of Ukraine: problems of providing for and enhancing of adequate living standards and quality of life. Management theory and studies for rural business and infrastructure development, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 18–26.
Gilman, R. (2013), The Eco-village Challenge. The challenge of developing a community living in balanced harmony – with itself as well as nature – is tough, but attainable. Context Institute, Catalyzing a graceful transition to the Planetary Era, available at: http://www. context.org/iclib/ic29/gilman1/.
The official site of Global Ecovilladg Network, available at: http://gen.ecovillage.org.
Plotnikova M. (2014), Multifunctional Approach to the Management of Rural Development in the Context of Globalization. The performance of agricultural production. Economic science, vol. 26, pp. 140–151.
