Structure of direct and concomitant effect of growth of volumes of commodity production in food enterprises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2019.05.03.07Keywords:
sales volume, cost of production, fixed and variable costs, sales price, revenue, profitability level, direct and indirect effect.Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of the study is to justify and to demonstrate, using a specific example, a methodology for calculation the direct and indirect effect from marginal sales growth and on this basis to provide lecturers and students of higher educational institutions, as well as industry specialists, with modern methodological tools.
Methodology / approach. During the study, general scientific and special methods were used, namely: abstract-logical method – to justify the methodology for calculating the amount of profit per unit of production; the method of economic comparison – for comparing the basic and calculation options, as well as a graphical method – for identifying the trends in changes of the output sales metrics.
Results. The study of the structure of the economic effect caused by the increase in volume of sales output has its own specifics. Implementation of new organizational-and-economic initiatives leads not only to a direct economic impact, but likewise to a significant indirect effect as well. The specifics of calculations of economic efficiency of innovative developments at food processing enterprises are provided. Furthermore, a method of calculating revenue per unit of production and in total across an enterprise, including those achieved due to output volume growth, a decrease in the cost of production and an increase in realised output prices, is presented. It is quite obvious that the revenue per unit of food processing output tends to increase alongside an increase in the total sales volume. However, hereby the following relationship is being identified: marginal revenue due to a decrease in the cost of production typically exceeds the marginal revenue due to an increase in sales revenues accordingly. This relationship is confirmed by a specific example of a beer company.
Originality / scientific novelty. The conducted research demonstrated that the efficiency of implementation of innovative developments at industrial enterprises which are directed towards an increase in sales volumes depend not only on marginal output volume, a decrease in the cost of production and an increase in sales prices, but also on an initial state of production expressed via a ratio of fixed costs to variable costs and a resulting level of production profitability accordingly. A higher economic effect is provided by an innovative development which – all else equal – is implemented on enterprises that have a higher share of fixed costs in the total structure and a lower output profitability respectively. The obtained research results are performed by the authors for a first time based on examples of a specific food processing enterprise.
Practical value / relevance. The provided method of economic evaluating of the structure of direct and indirect effects of output sales growth at a food processing enterprise can be characterised by the simplicity of implementation, and therefore will be in high demand in educational purposes and in practical production conditions.
References
Список использованных источников
Давидянц Д. Е., Жидков В. И., Слюсарев Г. В. Оценка динамической экономической эффективности пищевых предприятий. Экономические науки. 2018. № 2. C. 28–32.
Дугина Е. Л. Повышение эффективности деятельности предприятий пищевой промышленности региона. Проблемы теории и практики управления. 2011. № 2. C. 68–72.
Шиврина Т. Б. Проблемы и факторы, влияющие на эффективность деятельности предприятий пищевой промышленности города Кирова. Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. 2016. Вып. 6(48). Ч. 1. С. 96–98.
Павлик В. П. Проблеми ефективного управлiння сiльсько-господарськими пiдприємствами. Економiка АПК. 2015. № 11. С. 85–88.
Шпикуляк О. Г., Материнська О. А. Ефективнiсть виробництва зерна сiльскогосподарськими пiдприемствами: теретико-методологiчний аспект. Економiка АПК. 2014. № 12. С. 42–49.
Рассказова А., Жданова Р. Основные понятия экономической эффективности управления устойчивым землепользованием. Международный сельскохозяйственный журнал. 2017. № 1. С. 23–25.
Сиптиц С. Методы проектирования эффективных и устойчивых вариантов размещения сельскохозяйственного производства. Международный сельскохозяйственный журнал. 2017. № 6. С. 56–59. https://doi.org/10.24411/2587-6740-2017-16014.
Marshall E., Aillery M., Malcolm S., Williams R. Agricultural Production under Climate Change: The Potential Impacts of Shifting Regional Water Balances in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2015. Vol. 97. Is. 2. Pp. 568–588. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau122.
Mugera A. W., Langemeier M. R., Ojede A. Contributions of Productivity and Relative Price Changes to Farm-level Profitability Change. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2016. Vol. 98. Is. 4. Pp. 1210–1229. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaw029.
Chrastinová Z., Burianová V. Economic efficiency of Slovak agriculture and its commodity sectors. Agricultural Economics – Czech. 2012. Vol. 58. Pp. 92–99. https://doi.org/10.17221/162/2010-AGRICECON.
Dong G., Wang Z., Mao X. (2018), Production efficiency and GHG emissions reduction potential evaluation in the crop production system based on emergy synthesis and nonseparable undesirable output DEA: A case study in Zhejiang Province, China. PLoS ONE. 2018. Vol. 13(11). Pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206680.
Stratan A. Moldovan agri-food sector dilemma: east or west? Economics of agriculture. Ekonomika poljoprivrede. 2014. Vol. 61. Is. 3. Pp. 615–632. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1403615S.
Doga V., Bajura T. si altii. Strategia de dezvoltare a sectorului agroalimentar in perioada anilor 2006–2015. Еconomie si deyvoltare rurala imdrp. no. 2,4. 74 p.
Тодорич Л. Основы финансового менеджмента: уч. пособие. Комрат: Комратский гос. университет, 2017. 200 с.
Дудогло Т. Д. Управление земельным потенциалом региона: вопросы теории, методики, практики: монография. Комрат: Centrografic, 2017. 167 с.
Пармакли Д. М., Тодорич Л. П., Дудогло Т. Д., Яниогло А. И. Эффективность землепользования: теория, методика, практика: монография. Комрат: Centrografic, 2015. 274 p.
References
Davydyants, D. E., Zhidkov, V. I. and Slyusarev, G. V. (2018), Evaluation of Dynamic Economic Efficiency of Food Processing Enterprises. Economic Sciences, no. 2(27), pp. 28–32.
Dugina, E. L. (2011), Increase of Efficiency of Food Processing Enterprises of the Region. Problems of Management Theory and Practice, no. 2, pp. 68–72.
Shivrina, T. B. (2016), Problems and Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Food Processing Enterprises of the City of Kirov. International Scientific Research Journal, 2016, no. 6(48), part 1, pp. 96–98.
Pavlyk, V. P. (2015), Problems of efficient management of agricultural enterprises. Ekonomika APK, no. 11, pp. 85–88.
Shpykuliak, O. G. and Materinska, O. A. (2014), The crops-production efficiency of agrarian enterprises: theoretical and methodological aspects. Ekonomika APK, no. 12, pp. 44–49.
Rasskazova, A. and Zhdanova, R. (2017), Basic Concepts of Economic Efficiency in Management of Sustainable Land Use. International Agricultural Journal, no. 1, pp. 23–25. https://doi.org/10.24411/2587-6740-2017-16014.
Siptits, S. О. (2017), Methods of designing effective and sustainable variants of placing agricultural production. International Agricultural Journal, no. 6, pp. 56–59. https://doi.org/10.24411/2587-6740-2017-16014.
Marshall, E., Aillery, M., Malcolm, S. and Williams, R. (2015), Agricultural Production under Climate Change: The Potential Impacts of Shifting Regional Water Balances in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 97, is. 2, pp. 568–588. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau122.
Mugera, A. W., Langemeier, M. R. and Ojede, A. (2016), Contributions of Productivity and Relative Price Changes to Farm-level Profitability Change. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 98, is. 4, pp. 1210–1229. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaw029.
Chrastinová, Z. and Burianová, V. (2012), Economic efficiency of Slovak agriculture and its commodity sectors. Agricultural Economics – Czech, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 92–99. https://doi.org/10.17221/162/2010-AGRICECON.
Dong, G., Wang, Z. and Mao, X. (2018), Production efficiency and GHG emissions reduction potential evaluation in the crop production system based on emergy synthesis and nonseparable undesirable output DEA: A case study in Zhejiang Province, China. PLOS ONE, no. 11, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206680.
Stratan, A. (2014), Moldovan agri-food sector dilemma: east or west? Ekonomika poljoprivrede, vol. 61, is. 3, pp. 615–632. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1403615S.
Doga, V. and Bajura, T. et al. Development Strategy of Agricultural Sector in Years 2006–2015. Economics and Rural Development, No. 2, 4, 74 p.
Todorych, L. (2017), Osnovy fynansovoho menedzhmenta [Foundations of Financial Management], Comrat State University, Comrat, Republic of Moldova.
Dudoglo, T. D. (2017), Upravlenie zemel'nym potentsialom regiona: voprosy teorii, metodiki, praktiki [Management of the regional land potential: question of theory, methodology, practice], Centrografic, Comrat, Republic of Moldova.
Parmakli, D. M., Todorich, L. P., Dudoglo, T. D. and Ianioglo, A. I. (2015), Jeffektivnost' zemlepol'zovanija: teorija, metodika, praktika [The effectiveness of land use: theory, methodology, practice], Centrografic, Comrat, Republic of Moldova.
