Methodology of research of the process of economic modernization and development of livestock industry under conditions of deficit of financial resources
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of the article is a methodological substantiation of the problem of economic modernization and business development of livestock industry.
Methodology / approach. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study was the dialectical method of cognition of economic processes, fundamental provisions of modern economic theory, scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists, related to the study of the economic nature and content of relations between the subjects of the livestock products market.
The methodological basis of the study was those functional provisions that comprehensively highlighted the need for economic modernization and effective development of livestock in the face of scarcity of financial resources. The problem of the need for economic modernization and predicting the effective development of animal husbandry was investigated using a number of methods (correlation-regression, scenario planning, selective sociological research, mathematical modeling of economic processes, forecasting), which are aimed at identifying ways and mechanisms of knowledge of reality.
This made it possible to substantiate changes in livestock production, composition of the genetic potential of animals and their productivity, to identify factors that hinder the changing economic, social, political and environmental conditions in the livestock industry to innovate its development through the implementation of modern technologies. Using the regression analysis, the relationship between the phenomena (the numerical values of each observation result in the time series) was analyzed analytically in the form of mathematical functions.
Results. The peculiarities of application of the proposed methods and methodological approaches made it possible to take into account the main components of modernization transformations in livestock enterprises for the detection of changes in the genetic potential, animal productivity, production of livestock products, the implementation of modern technologies, farm machinery and equipment and to forecast the development of livestock industry.
The result of the implementation of the methodological approach to the development strategy of the livestock industry is the proposed list of strategic development scenarios, which creates opportunities for the implementation of the objectives of its development and outlines a problematic field for economic modernization.
Originality / scientific novelty. The article presents, for the first time, the results of the study that substantiate the feasibility of forming an information base and the study of dynamic changes in economic indicators of livestock development using an analytical approach in the study of problems of further development of the livestock industry, which, unlike existing ones, takes into account the influence of random variables that do not occur risky situations of the environment.
Practical value / implications. The use of the proposed models and methods and the integrated systematic approach for the research of problems of regional modernization transformations allows to ensure the implementation of the process of modernization itself, forecasting the development and use of technologies; to assess the specific nature of the scientific and technological direction, the level of economic and social measures for the introduction of new technologies; focus on a number of issues that have not yet been resolved for the sake of future benchmarks for businesses and their industries in a particular region.
References
Список використаних джерел
Baltagi Badi H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: John Wiley& Sons, Inc., 1995. 253 p.
Hausman J. A., Taylor W. E. Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica. 1981. № 49. Pp. 1377–1398. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911406.
Коваль П. В. Дослідження темпів і пропорцій відтворення в сільському господарстві за допомогою моделей лонгітюдних даних. Агроінком. 2006. № 3–4. С. 41–46.
Червак-Смерічко О. Ю. Моделі лонгітюдних даних в емпіричних дослідженнях. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія «Економіка». 2013. Вип. 3(40). С. 183–186.
Россоха В. В. Методологія та її роль в сучасних економічних дослідженнях. Агроінком. 2009. № 1–4. С. 50–55.
Андрійчук В. Г. Сучасний аспект методології наукових досліджень. Економіка АПК. 2016. № 7. С. 87–94.
Инглхарт Р., Вельцель К. Модернизация, культурные изменения и демократия: Последовательность человеческого развития. Москва: Новое издательство, 2011. 464 с.
Levy M. Modernization and the Structure of Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966. 156 p.
Бодров В. Державне управління модернізаційними процесами в економіці України. Аналітика і влада: журн. експерт. аналіт. матеріалів і наук. пр. Ін-ту пробл. держ. упр. та місц. самоврядування НАДУ. 2012. № 6. С. 126–132.
Геєць В. Модернізація в системі «Суспільство – Держава – Економіка». Журнал європейської економіки. 2014. Том 13. № 2. С. 111–124.
Гриценко А. Методологічні основи модернізації України. Економіка України. 2011. № 2. С. 4–12.
Bagchi M., Rahman S., Shunbo Y. Growth in Agricultural Productivity and Its Components in Bangladeshi Regions (1987–2009): An Application of Bootstrapped Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Economies. 2019. Vol. 7(2). 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7020037.
Chrastinová Z., Burianová V. Economic efficiency of Slovak agriculture and its commodity sectors. Agricultural Economics – Czech. 2012. Vol. 58. Pp. 92–99. https://doi.org/10.17221/162/2010-AGRICECON.
Błażejczyk-Majka L., Kala R. Concentration and productivity of livestock and mixed farms in new and old EU member states. A regional level approach. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 2015. Vol. 16. Is. 1. Pp. 159–176. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/16.1.1558.
Marshall E., Aillery M., Malcolm S., Williams R. Agricultural Production under Climate Change: The Potential Impacts of Shifting Regional Water Balances in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2015. Vol. 97. Is. 2. Pp. 568–588. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau122.
Le T. L., Lee P.-P., Peng K. Ch., Chung R. H. Evaluation of total factor productivity and environmental efficiency of agriculture in nine East Asian countries. Agricultural Economics – Czech. 2019. Vol. 65. Pp. 249–258. https://doi.org/10.17221/50/2018-AGRICECON.
Stratan A. Moldovan agri-food sector dilemma: east or west? Ekonomika poljoprivrede. 2014. Vol. 61. Is. 3. Pp. 615–632. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1403615S.
Pongpanich R., Peng K.-C., Wongchai A. The performance measurement and productivity change of agro and food industry in the stock exchange of Thailand. Agricultural Economics – Czech. 2018. Vol. 64. Pp. 89–99. https://doi.org/10.17221/15/2016-AGRICECON.
Березівський З. П., Березівська О. Я. Стан і перспективи економічного розвитку агропромислового комплексу Львівської області. Аграрна економіка. 2014. Т. 7. № 1–2. С. 54–59.
Месель-Веселяк В. Я., Грищенко О. Ю. Рейтингова оцінка регіонального соціально-економічного розвитку аграрного сектору економіки України: методика, розрахунки. Економіка АПК. 2017. № 11. С. 11–17.
Месель-Веселяк В. Я., Грищенко О. Ю. Поголів’я і виробництво продукції тваринництва в Україні. Київ: ННЦ «ІАЕ», 2013. 142 с.
Саблук П. Т. Інноваційна модель розвитку аграрного сектору економіки України та роль науки в її становленні. Проблеми інноваційно-інвестиційного розвитку. 2011. № 2. С. 34–42.
Свиноус І. В., Ібатуллін М. І. Сучасний стан свинарства України: проблеми та шляхи їх вирішення. Продуктивність агропромислового виробництва. Економічні науки. 2015. № 27. С. 63–67.
References
Baltagi Badi, H. (1995), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. John Wiley& Sons, Inc, New York, USA.
Hausman, J. A. and Taylor, W. E. (1981), Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica, no. 49, pp. 1377–1398. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911406.
Koval, P. V. (2006), Investigation of rates and proportions of reproduction in agriculture using models of longitudinal data. Agroincom, no. 3–4, pp. 41–46.
Chervak-Smerichko, O. Yu. (2013), Models of longitudinal data in empirical studies. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhgorod National University. Series «Economy», no. 3(40), pp. 183–186.
Andriyhuk, V. G. (2016), Modern aspect of methodology of scientific researches. Ekonomika APK, vol. 7, pp. 87–94.
Rossokha, V. V. (2009), Role of methodology in modern economical researches. Agroincom, vol. 1–4, pp. 50–55.
Inglehart, R. and Welzel, K. (2011), Modernizatsiya, kul'turnyye izmeneniya i demokratiya: Posledovatel'nost' chelovecheskogo razvitiya [Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Consistency of Human Development], New Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
Levy, M. (1966), Modernization and the Structure of Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Bodrov, V. (2012), State Management of Modernization Processes in the Economy of Ukraine. Analityka i vlada: National Academy of Public Administration, no. 6, pp. 126–132.
Geyets, V. (2014), Modernization in the system «Society – State – Economy». Journal of the European Economy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 111–124.
Hrytsenko, A. (2011), Methodological bases of modernization of Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, no. 2, pp. 4–12.
Bagchi, M., Rahman, S. and Shunbo, Y. (2019), Growth in Agricultural Productivity and Its Components in Bangladeshi Regions (1987–2009): An Application of Bootstrapped Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Economies, vol. 7(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7020037.
Chrastinová, Z. and Burianová, V. (2012), Economic efficiency of Slovak agriculture and its commodity sectors. Agricultural Economics – Czech, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 92–99. https://doi.org/10.17221/162/2010-AGRICECON.
Błażejczyk-Majka, L. and Kala, R. (2015), Concentration and productivity of livestock and mixed farms in new and old EU member states. A regional level approach. Journal of Central European Agriculture, vol. 16, is. 1, pp. 159–176. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/16.1.1558.
Marshall, E., Aillery, M., Malcolm, S. and Williams, R. (2015), Agricultural Production under Climate Change: The Potential Impacts of Shifting Regional Water Balances in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 97, is. 2, pp. 568–588. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau122.
Le, T. L., Lee, P.-P., Peng, K. Ch. and Chung, R. H. (2019), Evaluation of total factor productivity and environmental efficiency of agriculture in nine East Asian countries. Agricultural Economics – Czech, vol. 65, pp. 249–258. https://doi.org/10.17221/50/2018-AGRICECON.
Stratan, A. (2014), Moldovan agri-food sector dilemma: east or west? Economics of agriculture, vol. 61, is. 3, pp. 615–632. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1403615S.
Pongpanich, R., Peng, K.-C. and Wongchai, A. (2018), The performance measurement and productivity change of agro and food industry in the stock exchange of Thailand. Agricultural Economics – Czech, vol. 64, pp. 89–99. https://doi.org/10.17221/15/2016-AGRICECON.
Berezivsky, Z. P. and Berezivska, O. Ya. (2014), State and prospects of economic development of the agro-industrial complex of Lviv region. Agrarian economy, vol. 7, no. 1–2, pp. 54–59.
Mesel-Veselyak, V. Ya. and Gryshchenko, O. Yu. (2017), Rating estimation of regional socio-economic development of agrarian sector of Ukrainian economy: methodology, calculations. Ekonomika APK, no. 11, pp. 11–17.
Mesel-Veselyak, V. Ya. and Gryshchenko, O. Yu. (2013), Poholivіa i vyrobnytstvo produktsiyi tvarynnytstva v Ukrayini [Livestock and livestock production in Ukraine], IAE, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Sabluk, P. T. (2011), Innovative model of development of agrarian sector of economy of Ukraine and role of science in its formation. Problems of innovation and investment development, no. 2, pp. 34–42.
Svinous, I. V. and Ibatullin, M. I. (2015), The current state of pig production in Ukraine: problems and solutions. Productivity of agro-industrial production. Economic sciences, no. 27, pp. 63–67.
