Price transmission in milk supply chain in Ukraine

Keywords: price transmission, milk supply chain, symmetric and asymmetric price transmission, market power, food security, Ukraine.


Purpose. The purpose of the study, which results are submitted in the article, is to analyze the vertical price transmission along the milk supply chain in Ukraine and identify whether this price transmission is symmetric or asymmetric in terms of direction, magnitude, speed.

Methodology / approach. To achieve the purpose of the study, we used the following research methods: logical operations (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction) – to determine the structure of the milk supply chain, to make conclusions about main findings; the correlation analysis – to identify the tightness of links between farm’, processors’ and retailers’ prices; the trend modelling – to build the functions of the trend of prices of different levels of the milk supply chain; the regression modelling – to construct the regression functions of prices of downstream sectors of the milk supply chain; graphic – for visual presentation of main tendencies, pricing and price dynamics in the milk supply chain. The research was performed on the basis of the statistical data of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine for 2013–2020.

Results. This paper presents the empirical evidence of asymmetric price transmission along the milk supply chain in Ukraine. The results of modelling proved asymmetric magnitudes of price growth at the organizational and technological stages of the milk supply chain: in the case of the farm prices of raw milk increase the processors’ and retailers’ prices grow up by a much bigger magnitude. There is no leg in price transmission in the milk supply chain, the price shocks at the farm level instantly pass to processors’ and retailers’ prices. The evidence of asymmetry of price transmission testifies the weaknesses of the market positions of farmers and consumers in the milk supply chain in Ukraine, points out the threats for the food security and sustainable development of all agents of this chain.

Originality / scientific novelty. For the first time, the quantitative assessments of the magnitude and speed of the price changes in the process of price transmission in the milk supply chain in Ukraine were obtained. The asymmetry of the magnitudes of the vertical price transmission in the milk supply chain in Ukraine was identified. The hostage position of farmers in the case of price shocks was further proved.

Practical value / implications. This paper provides a better understanding of arrangements of market forces in the milk supply chain, the consequences of price chocks in the upstream sector of the milk supply chain. The practical value is the methodological and empirical support for the development of regulative measures to improve the milk supply chains functioning and sustain food security. Assessment and analysis of the mechanism of price transmission reveals the weak parts of the food supply chain, contributing to the scientific foundation of elaborating the necessary policy actions for harmonization of relations between producers of different stages of the milk chain.


1. Abdulai, A. (2002). Using threshold cointegration to estimate asymmetric price transmission in the swiss pork market. Applied Economics, 34(6), 679–687.
2. Ahn, B. I., & Lee, H. (2015). Vertical price transmission of perishable products: the case of fresh fruits in the Western United States. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 40(3), 405–424. Available at:
3. Assefa, T. T., Kuiper, W. E., & Meuwissen, M. P. (2014). The effect of farmer market power on the degree of farm retail price transmission: a simulation model with an application to the dutch ware potato supply chain. Agribusiness, 30(4), 424–437.
4. Bakucs, Z., Fałkowski, J., & Fertő, I. (2014). Does market structure influence price transmission in the agro-food sector? A meta-analysis perspective. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(1), 1–25.
5. Bakucs, Z., Fałkowski, J., & Fertő, I. (2012). What causes asymmetric price transmission in agro-food sector. Meta-analysis perspectives. 86th annual conference of the agricultural economics society, Coventry.
6. Bakucs, Z., & Fertõ, I. (2005). Marketing margins and price transmission on the hungarian pork meat market. Agribusiness, 21(2), 273–286.
7. Boyd, M. S., & Brorsen, B. W. (1988). Price asymmetry in the U.S. Pork marketing channel. North Central. Review of Agricultural Economics, 10(1), 103–109.
8. Bukeviciute, L., Dierx, A., & Ilzcotz, F. (2009). The functioning of food supply chain and its effect on food prices in the European Union. Occasional Papers 47. European Economy. Available at:
9. Burka, A., Hontar, V., Kyschuk, O. et al. (2017). Praktychnyi dovidnyk eksportera molochnoi produktsii [Practical guide exporter of dairy products]. Available at:
10. Chaudhry, M. I., & Miranda, M. J. (2020). Price transmission in Pakistan’s poultry supply chain. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45(2), 282–298.
11. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(336), 427–431.
12. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.
13. European Commission (2009). Analysis of price transmission along the food supply chain. The EU Commission Staff Working Document. Available at:
14. Eurostat (2020). How much are households spending on food? Available at:
15. Frey, G., & Manera, M. (2007). Econometric models of asymmetric price transmission. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(2), 349–415.
16. Improving market outcomes. Enhancing the position of farmers in the supply chain (2016). Report of Agricultural Market Task Force. Brussels. Available at:
17. Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector auto-regressive models. New York, Oxford University Press.
18. Kravchenko, О., Antoshchenkova, V., Batiuk, L., & Lysenko, V. (2020). Price transmission among the participants of the livestock products agrofood chain in Ukraine. Research in World Economy, 11(4), 72–80.
19. Kravchenko, O. (2020). Harmonizatsiia ekonomichnykh vidnosyn mizh uchasnykamy rynku produktsii tvarynnytstva [Harmonization of economic relations between market participants in livestock products]. Kharkiv, Smuhasta typohrafiia.
20. Lloyd, T. (2017). Forty years of price transmission research in the food industry: insights, challenges and prospects. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 3–21.
21. McCorriston, S., Morgan, C. W., & Rayner, A. J. (1998). Processing technology, market power and price transmission. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(2), 185–201.
22. Meyer, J., & Von Cramon-Taubadel, S. (2004). Asymmetric price transmission: a survey. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(3), 581–611.
23. Onegina, V. (2012). Conditions of equivalent exchange. Economy of Ukraine, 7, 4–15.
24. Onegina, V., Kravchenko, O., & Babaiev, I. (2019). Assessment of competitiveness of agricultural product: methodological aspects In O. Mandych, A. Ostenda (Eds), Innovative tools for socio-economic systems' development (pp. 78–85). Katowice, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Technicznej. Available at:
25. Peltzman, S. (2000). Prices rise faster than they fall. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 466–502.
26. Pocricak, J., & Rajcaniova, M. (2014). Price transmission along food supply chain in Slovakia. Post-communist Economies, 25(4), 555–568.
27. Reziti, I., & Panagopoulos, Y. (2008). Asymmetric price transmission in the Greek agri-food sector: some tests. Agribusiness, 24(1), 16–30.
28. Serra, T., & Goodwin, B. K. (2003). Price transmission and asymmetric adjustment in the Spanish dairy sector. Applied Economics, 35(18), 1889–1899.
29. Shyian, N., & Kolosha, V. (2020). Formation of milk prices in Ukraine in the context of world trends. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 6(4), 99–120.
30. Shyian, N., Moskalenko, V., Shabinskyi, O., & Pechko, V. (2021). Milk price modeling and forecasting. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 7(1), 81–95.
31. Simioni, M., Gonzales, F., Guillotreau, P., & Le Grel, L. (2013). Detecting asymmetric price transmission with consistent threshold along the fish supply chain. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(1), 37–60.
32. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2020). Statistical Information. Available at:
33. Tekgüç, H. (2013). Oligopoly and price transmission in Turkey's fluid milk market. Agribusiness, 29(3), 293–305.
34. Tweeten, L.G., & Quance, C. L. (1969). Positivistic measures of aggregate supply elasticities: some new approaches. American Journal of Agricultural Economic, 51(2), 342–352.
35. Vavra, P., & Goodwin, B. (2005). Analysis of price transmission along the food chain. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers. No. 3, Paris, OECD Publishing.
36. Von Cramon-Taubadel, S., & Loy, J. P. (1996). Price asymmetry in the international wheat market: comment. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44(3), 311–317.
37. Von Cramon-Taubadel, S., Loy, J-P., & Meyer, J. (2006). Data aggregation and vertical price transmission: an experiment with German food prices. 2006 Annual Meeting, Queensland. Available at:
38. Wolffram, R. (1971). Positivistic measures of aggregate supply elasticities – some new approaches – some critical notes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(2), 356–359.
How to Cite
Onegina, V., Megits, N., Kravchenko, O., & Kravchenko, Y. (2022). Price transmission in milk supply chain in Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 8(1), 152-170.