“Institution” and “institute”: tendency to the “false substitution” of concepts
Keywords:
institution, institute, institutional environment, agency, agrarian entrepreneurship.
Abstract
Purpose. The objective of the article is deepening the theoretical and methodological provisions of economics by justifying the feasibility the overcoming of the tendency of the “false substitution” of the basic concepts of the institutional theory in the national scientific environment due to the conceptual demarcation between the “institutions” and “institutes” based on the criteria and etymological identification of their key peculiarities.
Methodology / approach. The study is based on the dialectical method of cognition, systemic and structural approach to the studying of the institutional environment in general, and the institute of agrarian entrepreneurship in particular. To achieve the set objective the following methods were applied in the work: method of scientific generalization and comparison – to determine the essence of the categories “institution” and “institute”; the approaches of induction, structural analysis, and synthesis – to define the dialectics of interrelation between the institutions, institutes, organizations, agencies, norms, laws, customs, etc.; the associative method was applied to determine the correlations between the structural elements of the institutional environment in the context of the general and partial; the deductive method was applied to determine the essence of the social institutes; abstract-logical method and systematization were applied for the criterial and etymological identification of the key peculiarities of the institutions and institutes.
Results. The topicality of the clear conceptual and categorical framework during the institutional studies was substantiated to overcome the methodological discrepancies and inconsistencies between the theoretical implications in the scientific and political vocabulary. The scientific approaches to the interpretation are studied and the attempts of the conceptual demarcation between the categories “institution” and “institute” by the national and foreign scholars are analyzed. The dialectics of the interrelations between the institutions and institutes through the mediation of organizations, methods, agencies, and norms, rules, habits, traditions, laws, etc. is determined. It is found that the institutions are the resources of the creation of norms and rules and institutes are the means of their strengthening and propagation. The essence of the social institutes, such as the state, army, enterprise, family is considered. The characteristic features of the institutions and institutes are outlined. The structure of the institute of agrarian entrepreneurship in Ukraine is described. The modern tendencies in changes of the institutional mechanisms of the relations between the subjects of the agrarian sphere conditioned by the legislative innovations are analyzed. The perspectives of further research towards the improvement of the structure of the institutional environment in the agrarian and other spheres are determined.
Originality / scientific novelty. It is improved the conceptual framework of the institutional theory consisting in the demarcation between the concepts “institution” and “institutes” according to the criteria and etymological identification of their key peculiarities, mainly: functionality, generality, social necessity, moral authority (motivating force), psychological aspect, externality, organizational impact on the social life (for the institution) and historicity, structuredness, structuring, objectivity, compulsoriness, hierarchy, organization, legislative entrenchment / legitimacy (for the institute).
Practical value / implications. The results of the study constitute the background for further elaboration of the institutional theory within the national scientific environment since they allow for overcoming the tendency of the “false substitution” of concepts in the interpretation of its basic categories. In its turn, the implementation of the differential usage of terms and understanding the essence and dialectics of the relations between the institutions and institutes is a push towards the improvement of the institutional structure of the national economy to improve the welfare of all its members and society in general.
References
1. Aracil E., Gómez-Bengoechea G., Moreno-de-Tejada O. Institutional quality and the financial inclusion-poverty alleviation link: empirical evidence across countries. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2021. Vol. 22. Is. 1. Pp. 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.006.
2. Draskovic M., Bauk S., Delibasic M. Testing the level and factors of institutional rationality in Montenegro, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Economics and Sociology. 2016. Vol. 9. No. 2. Pp. 27–45. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/2.
3. Kaasa A. Social capital, institutional quality and productivity: evidence from European regions. Economics and Sociology. 2016. Vol. 9. No. 4. Рp. 11–26. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/1.
4. Balcerzak A. P., Pietrzak M. B. Quality of institutions for knowledge-based economy within new institutional economics framework. Multiple criteria decision analysis for European countries in the years 2000–2013. Economics and Sociology. 2016. Vol. 9. No. 4. Рp. 66–81. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071- 789X.2016/9-4/4.
5. Danaj A., Lazányi K., Bilan Y. Perceptions and implications of immigration in France – economic, social, political and cultural perspectives. Economics and Sociology. 2018. No. 11. No. 3. Рр. 226–247. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/14.
6. Shkodra J., Ymeri P., Ibishi L. Role of microfinance institutions for developing women entrepreneurship – the case study of Kosovo. Economics and Sociology. 2020. No. 14. No. 1. Рр. 120–129. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2021/14-1/8.
7. Draskovic M., Jovovic R., Draskovic V., Jovovic N. Levels and factors of transitional crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Serbia. Economics and Sociology. 2017. Vol. 1. No. 2. Рp. 21–32. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-2/2.
8. Jankowska B., Di Maria E., Cygler J. Do clusters matter for foreign subsidiaries in the Era of industry 4.0? The case of the aviation valley in Poland. European Research on Management and Business Economics. 2021. Vol. 27. Is. 2. 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100150.
9. Capellán R., Ollero J., García Pozo A. The influence of the real estate investment trust in the real estate sector on the Costa del Sol. European Research on Management and Business Economics. 2021. Vol. 27. Is. 1. 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.10.003.
10. Ahmed F., Kousar S., Pervaiz A., Shabbir A. Do institutional quality and financial development affect sustainable economic growth? Evidence from South Asian countries. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2021. Vol. 22. Is. 1. Рp. 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.005.
11. Muye M. I., Muye I. Yu. Testing for causality among globalization, institution and financial development: further evidence from three economic blocs. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2017. Vol. 17. Is. 2. Рp. 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.10.001.
12. Nguyen C. P., Schinckus C., Dinh Su T., Chong F. Institutions, inward foreign direct investment, trade openness and credit level in emerging market economies. Review of Development Finance. 2018. Vol. 8. Is. 2. Рp. 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2018.11.005.
13. Maruta A. A. Trade aid, institutional quality, and trade. Journal of Economics and Business. 2019. Vol. 103. Рp. 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.12.001.
14. Chikalipah S. Credit risk in microfinance industry: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Review of Development Finance. 2018. Vol. 8. Is. 1. Рp. 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2018.05.004.
15. Gietzen T. The exposure of microfinance institutions to financial risk. Review of Development Finance. 2017. Vol. 7. Is. 2. Рp. 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2017.04.001.
16. Donou-Adonsou F., Sylwester K. Financial development and poverty reduction in developing countries: new evidence from banks and microfinance institutions. Review of Development Finance. 2016. Vol. 6. Is. 1. Рp. 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2016.06.002.
17. Галянт С. Інституціональне середовище функціонування газорозподільних підприємств західного регіону. Економічний часопис Східноєвропейського національного університету імені Лесі Українки. 2020. Т. 2. № 22. С. 152–160. https://doi.org/10.29038/2411-4014-2020-02-152-160.
18. Запухляк І. Б. Інституційні засади забезпечення розвитку вітчизняних газотранспортних підприємств. Economic Annals-XXI. 2016. Вип. 158. № 3–4(2). С. 39–42. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V158-09.
19. Мартинова Н. Б. Інституційне забезпечення реалізації конкурентної соціально-економічної політики у відповідності до вимог ЄС. Вісник Хмельницького національного університету. 2016. № 5. Т. 2. С. 220–225. URL: http://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/pdf/ekon/pdfbase/2016/VKNU-ES-2016-N5-Volume2_240.pdf.
20. Обушна Н. І. Особливості категоріального апарату інституціональної теорії у площині державного управління. Менеджер. Вісник Донецького державного університету управління. 2016. № 1. С. 40–48. URL: https://ojs.dsum.edu.ua/index.php/manager/article/view/289.
21. Прокопенко Н., Виклюк М., Скорик М. Механізм державного регулювання аграрного сектора економіки: інституційний аспект. Ефективність державного управління. 2016. Вип. 3(48). Ч. 2. С. 263–270. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efdu_2016_3_32.
22. Стрижак О. О. Теоретичні основи дослідження інституціонального середовища людського розвитку. Вісник КрНУ імені Михайла Остроградського. 2016. Вип. 4(99). С. 115–123. URL: http://www.kdu.edu.ua/PUBL/statti/2016_4_115-4-2016.pdf.
23. Тимофіїв Т. Інституційне забезпечення функціонування молокопродуктового підкомплексу. Agriculturaland Resource Economics. 2016. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pp. 142–151. URL: https://are-journal.com/are/article/view/27.
24. Shvedovsky V., Standrik A., Bilan Y. Economic and social institutions: modelling the evolution paths for the archaic society. Economics and Sociology. 2016. Vol. 9. No. 2. Рp. 137–147. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/9.
25. Бест М. Новая конкуренция. Институты промышленного развития. Москва: ТЕИС, 2002. 835 с. URL: https://altairbook.com/books/1276613-novaya-konkurenciya-instituty-promyshlennogo-razvitiya.html.
26. Эггертссон Т. Экономическое поведение и институты: монография. Москва: Дело, 2001. 407 с. URL: http://www.library.fa.ru/files/Eggertsson.pdf.
27. Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики / пер. с англ. А. Н. Нестеренко. Москва: Фонд экономической книги «Начала». 1997. 180 с.
28. Ходжсон Дж. Экономическая теория и институты: манифест современной институциональной экономической теории. Москва: Дело, 2003. 464 с.
29. Фуруботн Э. Г., Рихтер Р. Институты и экономическая теория: достижения новой институциональной экономической теории / пер. с англ. под ред. В. С. Катькало, Н. П. Дроздовой. Санкт-Петербург: Изд. дом СПбГУ, 2005. 702 с.
30. Фролов Д. Эволюционная перспектива институциональной экономики России. Волгоград: Изд-во ВолГУ, 2008. 462 с.
31. Veblen T. The theory of the leisure class: an economic study of institutions. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1899. 412 p. URL: https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Veblen/Veblen_1899/Veblen_1899_toc.html.
32. Веблен Т. Теория праздного класса / пер. с англ. С. Т. Сорокина. Москва: Прогресс, 1984. 194 с.
33. Зотов В. В., Пресняков В. Ф., Розенталь В. О. Институциональные проблемы реализации системных функций экономики. Экономическая наука современной России. 2001. № 3. С. 35–41.
34. Маркс К. Капитал. Критика политической экономии. Т. 1. Кн. 1. Процесс производства капитала. Москва: Госполитиздат, 1951. 794 с.
35. Кирдина С. Г., Малков С. Ю. Моделирование самоорганизации экономики отраслей с повышающимися и понижающимися предельными издержками. Эволюционная теория, теория самопроизводства и экономическое развитие: матер. 7-го междунар. симпозиума по эволюционной экономике, 14–15 сентября 2007 г.; отв. ред. В. И. Маевский, С. Г. Кирдина. Москва: Институт экономики РАН, 2008. С. 167–168.
36. Иншаков О. В. Институция и институт: проблемы категориальной дифференциации и интеграции. ЭНСР. 2010. № 3(50). С. 26–38.
37. Великий тлумачний словник сучасної української мови / укл. і голов. ред. В. Т. Бусел. Київ, Ірпінь: ВТФ «Перун», 2005. 1728 с. URL: http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/ulib/item/UKR0000989.
38. Кармазіна М., Шурбована О. «Інститут» та «інституція»: проблема розрізнення понять. Політичний менеджмент. 2006. № 4. С. 10–19. URL: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/9611/02-Karmazina.pdf?sequence=1.
39. Майбурд М. Е. Введение в историю экономической мысли. От пророков до профессоров. Москва: Совместное издание «Дело» и «Вита-Пресс». 1996. 544 с.
40. Buriak A., Vozňáková I., Sułkowska J., Kryvych Y. Social trust and institutional (bank) trust: empirical evidence of interaction. Economics and Sociology. 2019. № 12(4). Pр. 116–129. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/7.
41. Çera G., Belas J., Rozsa Z., Cepel M. Linking firm characteristics to perceived important social factors for entrepreneurial activity. Economics and Sociology. 2019. № 12(4). Pр. 101–115. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/6.
42. Petrakis P. E, Valsamis D. G., Kafka K. I. From optimal to stagnant growth: the role of institutions and culture. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2017. Vol. 2. Is. 3. Pp. 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.011.
43. Lubacha-Sember J., Godlewska M. The role of local formal and informal institutions in microfirms’ development: evidence from Poland. Economics and Sociology. 2017. № 11. No. 3. Pр. 43–58. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/3.
44. Martínez J. B., Fernández M. L., Fernández P. M. Corporate social responsibility: evolution through institutional and stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Management and Business Economics. 2016. Vol. 25. Is. 1. Pp. 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2015.11.002.
45. Лозинська Т. До проблеми вживання термінів «інститут» і «інституція» в контексті інституціонального аналізу. Бізнес Інформ. 2014. № 7. С. 8–13. URL: https://www.business-inform.net/annotated-catalogue/?year=2014&abstract=2014_07_0.
46. Вовканич С. Й. Префекти в системі децентралізації влади: новий інститут, модерна інституція (організація) чи розвиток в Україні неоінституціоналізму? Регіональна економіка. 2016. № 2(80). С. 18–33. URL: https://re.gov.ua/doi/re2016.02.018_u.php.
47. Касториадис К. Воображаемое установление общества. Москва: Гнозис; Киев: Логос. 2003. 480 с. URL: http://library.khpg.org/files/docs/1385716028.pdf.
48. Дворецкий И. Х. Латинско-русский словарь. Москва: Русский язык, 1986. 843 с.
49. Сисоєв О. В. Поняття «інститут» та «інституція»: економічний контекст. Вісник Запорізького національного університету. 2014. № 3(23). С. 140–149. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vznu_eco_2014_3_18.
50. Макалюк І. В., Круш П. В. Управління трансакційними витратами промислових підприємств: методологія і практика: монографія. Київ: Кондор. 2019. 300 с.
51. Ong Ch. Z., Mohd-Rashid R., Taufil-Mohd K. N. Do institutional investors drive the IPO valuation? Borsa Istanbul Review. 2020. Vol. 20. No. 4. Pр. 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.05.003.
52. Wang Ch.-Y., Weng Y.-Ch., Wang L. Effect of air quality on corporate environmental disclosure: the moderating role of institutional investors. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2021. Vol. 21. No. 1. Pр. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.005.
53. Ibrahim Y., Ahmed I., Minai M. S. The Influence of institutional characteristics on financial performance of microfinance institutions in the OIC countries. Economics and Sociology. 2018. No. 11. No. 2. Pр. 19–35. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-2/2.
54. Wardhono A., Arifandi J. A., Indrawati Y. The opportunities and challenges of institutional arrangement for Besuki Na-Oogst tobacco cultivation business: case study in Jember Regency Indonesia. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2018. Vol. 4. No. 3. Pp. 44–54. URL: https://are-journal.com/are/article/view/183.
55. Про внесення змін до деяких законодавчих актів України щодо умов обігу земель сільськогосподарського призначення: Закон України від 31.03.2020 р. № 552-IX. Відомості Верховної ради України. 2020. № 20. C. 142. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/552-20#Text.
References
1. Aracil, E., Gómez-Bengoechea, G., & Moreno-de-Tejada, O. (2021). Institutional quality and the financial inclusion-poverty alleviation link: empirical evidence across countries. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(1), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.006.
2. Draskovic, M., Bauk, S., & Delibasic, M. (2016). Testing the level and factors of institutional rationality in Montenegro, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Economics and Sociology, 9(2), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/2.
3. Kaasa, A. (2016). Social capital, institutional quality and productivity: evidence from European regions. Economics and Sociology, 9(4), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/1.
4. Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2016). Quality of institutions for knowledge-based economy within new institutional economics framework. multiple criteria decision analysis for European countries in the years 2000–2013. Economics and Sociology, 9(4), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071- 789X.2016/9-4/4.
5. Danaj, A., Lazányi, K., & Bilan, Y. (2018). Perceptions and implications of immigration in France – economic, social, political and cultural perspectives. Economics and Sociology, 11(3), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/14.
6. Shkodra, J., Ymeri, P., & Ibishi, L. (2020). Role of microfinance institutions for developing women entrepreneurship – the case study of Kosovo. Economics and Sociology, 4(1), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2021/14-1/8.
7. Draskovic, M., Jovovic, R., Draskovic, V., & Jovovic, N. (2017). Levels and factors of transitional crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Serbia. Economics and Sociology, 1(2), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-2/2.
8. Jankowska, B., Di Maria, E., & Cygler, J. (2021). Do clusters matter for foreign subsidiaries in the Era of industry 4.0? The case of the aviation valley in Poland. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(2), 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100150.
9. Capellán, R., Ollero, J., & García Pozo, A. (2021). The influence of the real estate investment trust in the real estate sector on the Costa del Sol. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(1), 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.10.003.
10. Ahmed, F., Kousar, S., & Pervaiz, A. (2021). Do institutional quality and financial development affect sustainable economic growth? Evidence from South Asian countries. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(1), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.005.
11. Muye, M. I., & Muye, I. Yu. (2017). Testing for causality among globalization, institution and financial development: further evidence from three economic blocs. Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.10.001.
12. Nguyen, P. C., Schinckus, C., Dinh Su. T., & Chong, F. (2018). Institutions, inward foreign direct investment, trade openness and credit level in emerging market economies. Review of Development Finance, 8(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2018.11.005.
13. Maruta, A. A. (2019). Trade aid, institutional quality, and trade. Journal of Economics and Business, 103, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.12.001.
14. Chikalipah, S. (2018). Credit risk in microfinance industry: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Review of Development Finance, 8(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2018.05.004.
15. Gietzen, T. (2017). The exposure of microfinance institutions to financial risk. Review of Development Finance, 7(2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2017.04.001.
16. Donou-Adonsou, F., & Sylwester, K. (2016). Financial development and poverty reduction in developing countries: new evidence from banks and microfinance institutions. Review of Development Finance, 6(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2016.06.002.
17. Haliant, S. (2020). Institutional environment of functioning of gas distribution enterprises in the western region. Economic Journal of Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, 2(22), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.29038/2411-4014-2020-02-152-160.
18. Zapuhlyak, І. (2016). Institutional framework for the development of domestic gas transportation enterprises. Economic Annals-XXI, 158(3–4(2)), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V158-09.
19. Martynova, N. B. (2016). Institutional enforcement of competitive socio-economic policy in accordance with EU requirements. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 5(2), 220–225. Available at: http://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/pdf/ekon/pdfbase/2016/VKNU-ES-2016-N5-Volume2_240.pdf.
20. Obushna, N. I. (2016). Features of the categorical apparatus of institutional theory in the state administration plane. Manager. Bulletin of Donetsk State University of Management, 1, 40–48. Available at: https://ojs.dsum.edu.ua/index.php/manager/article/view/289.
21. Prokopenko, N., Vykliuk, M., & Skoryk, M. (2016). Mechanism of state regulation of the agrarian sector of the economy: institutional aspect. Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 3(48), 2, 263–270. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efdu_2016_3_32.
22. Stryzhak, O. O. (2016). Theoretical bases of research of the institutional environment of human development. Visnyk KrNU imeni Mykhaila Ostrohradskoho, 4(99), 115–123. Available at: http://www.kdu.edu.ua/PUBL/statti/2016_4_115-4-2016.pdf.
23. Tymofiiiv, T. (2016). Institutional maintenance of the milk productive subcomplexfunctioning. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2(1), 142–151. Available at: https://are-journal.com/are/article/view/27.
24. Shvedovsky, V., Standrik, A., Bilan, Y. (2016). Economic and social institutions: modelling the evolution paths for the archaic society. Economics and Sociology, 9(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/9.
25. Best, M. (2002). Novaja konkurencija. Instituty promyshlennogo razvitija [New competition. Institutes of Industrial Development]. Moscow, TEIS. Available at: https://altairbook.com/books/1276613-novaya-konkurenciya-instituty-promyshlennogo-razvitiya.html.
26. Jeggertsson, T. (2001). Ekonomicheskoe povedenie i instituty [Economic behavior and institutions]. Moscow, Delo. Available at: http://www.library.fa.ru/files/Eggertsson.pdf.
27. North, D. (1997). Instituty, institucional'nye izmenenija i funkcionirovanie jekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance] (A. N. Nesterenko, Trans.). Moscow, Fond jekonomicheskoj knigi «Nachala».
28. Hodgson, G. (2003). Jekonomicheskaja teorija i instituty: manifest sovremennoj institucional'noj jekonomicheskoj teorii [Economics and institutions: a manifesto for a modern institutional economics]. Moscow, Delo.
29. Furubotn, Je. G., & Rihter, R. (2005). Instituty i jekonomicheskaja teorija: dostizhenija novoj institucional'noj jekonomicheskoj teorii [Institutions and economic theory: the contribution of the new institutional economics], (V. S. Katkalo, N. P. Drozdova, Trans. Eds). St. Petersburg, Izd. dom SPbGU.
30. Frolov, D. (2008). Jevoljucionnaja perspektiva institucional'noj jekonomiki Rossii [Evolutionary perspective of the institutional economy of Russia]. Volgograd, VolGU.
31. Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the leisure class: an economic study of institutions. New York, The Macmillan Company. Available at: https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Veblen/Veblen_1899/Veblen_1899_toc.html.
32. Veblen, T. (1984). The Theory of the Leisure Clas (S. T. Sorokyna Trans). Moscow, Progress.
33. Zotov, V. V., Presnjakov, V. F., & Rozental, V. O. (2001). Institutional problems of implementing system functions of the economy. Jekonomicheskaja nauka sovremennoj Rossii, 3, 35–41.
34. Marks, K. (1951). Kapital. Kritika politicheskoj jekonomii. T. 1. Kn. 1. Process proizvodstva kapitala [Capital. Criticism of political economy. Vol. 1. Book 1. Capital production process]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat.
35. Kirdina, S. G., & Malkov, S. Ju. (2008). Modeling the self-organization of the economy of industries with increasing and lower limit costs. Evolutionary theory, theory of sprucement and economic development: 7th International Symposium on Evolutionary Economics. Moscow, Institute of Economics RAN.
36. Inshakov, O. V. (2010). Institution and institute: problems of categorical differentiation and integration. JeNSR, 3(50), 26–38.
37. Busel, V. T. Ed. (2005). Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy [Great interpretation dictionary of modern Ukrainian language]. Kyiv, VTF «Perun».
38. Karmazina, M., & Shurbovana, O. (2006). «Institute» and «Institution»: the problem of distinguishing concepts. Politychnyi menedzhment, 4, 10–19. Available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/9611/02-Karmazina.pdf?sequence=1.
39. Majburd, M. E. (1996). Vvedenie v istoriju jekonomicheskoj mysli. Ot prorokov do professorov [An introduction to the history of economic thought. From prophets to professors]. Moscow, Delo & Vita-Press.
40. Buriak, A., Vozňáková, I., Sułkowska, J., & Kryvych, Y. (2019). Social trust and institutional (bank) trust: empirical evidence of interaction. Economics and Sociology, 12(4), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/7.
41. Çera, G., Belas, J., Rozsa, Z., & Cepel, M. (2019). Linking firm characteristics to perceived important social factors for entrepreneurial activity. Economics and Sociology, 12(4), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/6.
42. Petrakis, P. E., Valsamis, D. G., & Kafka, K. I. (2017). From optimal to stagnant growth: the role of institutions and culture. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(3), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.011.
43. Lubacha-Sember, J., & Godlewska, M. (2017). The role of local formal and informal institutions in microfirms’ development: evidence from Poland. Economics and Sociology, 11(3), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/3.
44. Martínez, J. B., Fernández, M. L., & Fernández, P. M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: evolution through institutional and stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2015.11.002.
45. Lozynska, T. (2014). To the problem of using the terms «Institute» and «Institution» in the context of institutional analysis. Business Inform, 7, 8–13. Available at: https://www.business-inform.net/annotated-catalogue/?year=2014&abstract=2014_07_0.
46. Vovkanych, S. Y. (2016). Prefects in the system of decentralization of power: new institute, modern institution (organization) or development of neinstitutionalism in Ukraine? Rehionalna ekonomika, 2(80), 18–33. Available at: https://re.gov.ua/doi/re2016.02.018_u.php.
47. Kastoriadis, K. (2003). Voobrazhaemoe ustanovlenie obshhestva [Imaginary establishment of society]. Gnozis, Moscow; Logos, Kyiv.
48. Dvoreckij, I. H. (1986). Latinsko-russkij slovar' [Latin-Russian dictionary]. Moscow, Russkij jazyk.
49. Sysoiev, O. V. (2014). The concept of “Institute” and “Institution”: economic context. Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 3(23), 140–149. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vznu_eco_2014_3_18.
50. Makaliuk, I. V., & Krush, P. V. (2019). Upravlinnia transaktsiinymy vytratamy promyslovykh pidpryiemstv: metodolohiia i praktyka [Management of transaction costs of industrial enterprises: methodology and practice], Kyiv, Kondor.
51. Ong, Ch. Z., Mohd-Rashid, R., & Taufil-Mohd, K. N. (2020). Do institutional investors drive the IPO valuation? Borsa Istanbul Review, 20(4), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.05.003.
52. Wang, Ch.-Y., Weng, Y.-Ch., & Wang, L. (2021). Effect of air quality on corporate environmental disclosure: the moderating role of institutional investors. Borsa Istanbul Review, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.005.
53. Ibrahim, Y., Ahmed, I., & Minai, M. S. (2018). The influence of institutional characteristics on financial performance of microfinance institutions in the OIC countries. Economics and Sociology, 11(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-2/2.
54. Wardhono, A., Arifandi, J. A., & Indrawati, Y. (2018). The opportunities and challenges of institutional arrangement for Besuki Na-Oogst tobacco cultivation business: case study in Jember Regency Indonesia. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 4(3), 44–54. Available at: https://are-journal.com/are/article/view/183.
55. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2020), The Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine regarding the terms of circulation of agricultural land”. Vidomosti Verhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 20. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/552-20#Text.
2. Draskovic M., Bauk S., Delibasic M. Testing the level and factors of institutional rationality in Montenegro, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Economics and Sociology. 2016. Vol. 9. No. 2. Pp. 27–45. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/2.
3. Kaasa A. Social capital, institutional quality and productivity: evidence from European regions. Economics and Sociology. 2016. Vol. 9. No. 4. Рp. 11–26. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/1.
4. Balcerzak A. P., Pietrzak M. B. Quality of institutions for knowledge-based economy within new institutional economics framework. Multiple criteria decision analysis for European countries in the years 2000–2013. Economics and Sociology. 2016. Vol. 9. No. 4. Рp. 66–81. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071- 789X.2016/9-4/4.
5. Danaj A., Lazányi K., Bilan Y. Perceptions and implications of immigration in France – economic, social, political and cultural perspectives. Economics and Sociology. 2018. No. 11. No. 3. Рр. 226–247. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/14.
6. Shkodra J., Ymeri P., Ibishi L. Role of microfinance institutions for developing women entrepreneurship – the case study of Kosovo. Economics and Sociology. 2020. No. 14. No. 1. Рр. 120–129. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2021/14-1/8.
7. Draskovic M., Jovovic R., Draskovic V., Jovovic N. Levels and factors of transitional crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Serbia. Economics and Sociology. 2017. Vol. 1. No. 2. Рp. 21–32. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-2/2.
8. Jankowska B., Di Maria E., Cygler J. Do clusters matter for foreign subsidiaries in the Era of industry 4.0? The case of the aviation valley in Poland. European Research on Management and Business Economics. 2021. Vol. 27. Is. 2. 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100150.
9. Capellán R., Ollero J., García Pozo A. The influence of the real estate investment trust in the real estate sector on the Costa del Sol. European Research on Management and Business Economics. 2021. Vol. 27. Is. 1. 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.10.003.
10. Ahmed F., Kousar S., Pervaiz A., Shabbir A. Do institutional quality and financial development affect sustainable economic growth? Evidence from South Asian countries. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2021. Vol. 22. Is. 1. Рp. 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.005.
11. Muye M. I., Muye I. Yu. Testing for causality among globalization, institution and financial development: further evidence from three economic blocs. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2017. Vol. 17. Is. 2. Рp. 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.10.001.
12. Nguyen C. P., Schinckus C., Dinh Su T., Chong F. Institutions, inward foreign direct investment, trade openness and credit level in emerging market economies. Review of Development Finance. 2018. Vol. 8. Is. 2. Рp. 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2018.11.005.
13. Maruta A. A. Trade aid, institutional quality, and trade. Journal of Economics and Business. 2019. Vol. 103. Рp. 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.12.001.
14. Chikalipah S. Credit risk in microfinance industry: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Review of Development Finance. 2018. Vol. 8. Is. 1. Рp. 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2018.05.004.
15. Gietzen T. The exposure of microfinance institutions to financial risk. Review of Development Finance. 2017. Vol. 7. Is. 2. Рp. 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2017.04.001.
16. Donou-Adonsou F., Sylwester K. Financial development and poverty reduction in developing countries: new evidence from banks and microfinance institutions. Review of Development Finance. 2016. Vol. 6. Is. 1. Рp. 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2016.06.002.
17. Галянт С. Інституціональне середовище функціонування газорозподільних підприємств західного регіону. Економічний часопис Східноєвропейського національного університету імені Лесі Українки. 2020. Т. 2. № 22. С. 152–160. https://doi.org/10.29038/2411-4014-2020-02-152-160.
18. Запухляк І. Б. Інституційні засади забезпечення розвитку вітчизняних газотранспортних підприємств. Economic Annals-XXI. 2016. Вип. 158. № 3–4(2). С. 39–42. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V158-09.
19. Мартинова Н. Б. Інституційне забезпечення реалізації конкурентної соціально-економічної політики у відповідності до вимог ЄС. Вісник Хмельницького національного університету. 2016. № 5. Т. 2. С. 220–225. URL: http://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/pdf/ekon/pdfbase/2016/VKNU-ES-2016-N5-Volume2_240.pdf.
20. Обушна Н. І. Особливості категоріального апарату інституціональної теорії у площині державного управління. Менеджер. Вісник Донецького державного університету управління. 2016. № 1. С. 40–48. URL: https://ojs.dsum.edu.ua/index.php/manager/article/view/289.
21. Прокопенко Н., Виклюк М., Скорик М. Механізм державного регулювання аграрного сектора економіки: інституційний аспект. Ефективність державного управління. 2016. Вип. 3(48). Ч. 2. С. 263–270. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efdu_2016_3_32.
22. Стрижак О. О. Теоретичні основи дослідження інституціонального середовища людського розвитку. Вісник КрНУ імені Михайла Остроградського. 2016. Вип. 4(99). С. 115–123. URL: http://www.kdu.edu.ua/PUBL/statti/2016_4_115-4-2016.pdf.
23. Тимофіїв Т. Інституційне забезпечення функціонування молокопродуктового підкомплексу. Agriculturaland Resource Economics. 2016. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pp. 142–151. URL: https://are-journal.com/are/article/view/27.
24. Shvedovsky V., Standrik A., Bilan Y. Economic and social institutions: modelling the evolution paths for the archaic society. Economics and Sociology. 2016. Vol. 9. No. 2. Рp. 137–147. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/9.
25. Бест М. Новая конкуренция. Институты промышленного развития. Москва: ТЕИС, 2002. 835 с. URL: https://altairbook.com/books/1276613-novaya-konkurenciya-instituty-promyshlennogo-razvitiya.html.
26. Эггертссон Т. Экономическое поведение и институты: монография. Москва: Дело, 2001. 407 с. URL: http://www.library.fa.ru/files/Eggertsson.pdf.
27. Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики / пер. с англ. А. Н. Нестеренко. Москва: Фонд экономической книги «Начала». 1997. 180 с.
28. Ходжсон Дж. Экономическая теория и институты: манифест современной институциональной экономической теории. Москва: Дело, 2003. 464 с.
29. Фуруботн Э. Г., Рихтер Р. Институты и экономическая теория: достижения новой институциональной экономической теории / пер. с англ. под ред. В. С. Катькало, Н. П. Дроздовой. Санкт-Петербург: Изд. дом СПбГУ, 2005. 702 с.
30. Фролов Д. Эволюционная перспектива институциональной экономики России. Волгоград: Изд-во ВолГУ, 2008. 462 с.
31. Veblen T. The theory of the leisure class: an economic study of institutions. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1899. 412 p. URL: https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Veblen/Veblen_1899/Veblen_1899_toc.html.
32. Веблен Т. Теория праздного класса / пер. с англ. С. Т. Сорокина. Москва: Прогресс, 1984. 194 с.
33. Зотов В. В., Пресняков В. Ф., Розенталь В. О. Институциональные проблемы реализации системных функций экономики. Экономическая наука современной России. 2001. № 3. С. 35–41.
34. Маркс К. Капитал. Критика политической экономии. Т. 1. Кн. 1. Процесс производства капитала. Москва: Госполитиздат, 1951. 794 с.
35. Кирдина С. Г., Малков С. Ю. Моделирование самоорганизации экономики отраслей с повышающимися и понижающимися предельными издержками. Эволюционная теория, теория самопроизводства и экономическое развитие: матер. 7-го междунар. симпозиума по эволюционной экономике, 14–15 сентября 2007 г.; отв. ред. В. И. Маевский, С. Г. Кирдина. Москва: Институт экономики РАН, 2008. С. 167–168.
36. Иншаков О. В. Институция и институт: проблемы категориальной дифференциации и интеграции. ЭНСР. 2010. № 3(50). С. 26–38.
37. Великий тлумачний словник сучасної української мови / укл. і голов. ред. В. Т. Бусел. Київ, Ірпінь: ВТФ «Перун», 2005. 1728 с. URL: http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/ulib/item/UKR0000989.
38. Кармазіна М., Шурбована О. «Інститут» та «інституція»: проблема розрізнення понять. Політичний менеджмент. 2006. № 4. С. 10–19. URL: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/9611/02-Karmazina.pdf?sequence=1.
39. Майбурд М. Е. Введение в историю экономической мысли. От пророков до профессоров. Москва: Совместное издание «Дело» и «Вита-Пресс». 1996. 544 с.
40. Buriak A., Vozňáková I., Sułkowska J., Kryvych Y. Social trust and institutional (bank) trust: empirical evidence of interaction. Economics and Sociology. 2019. № 12(4). Pр. 116–129. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/7.
41. Çera G., Belas J., Rozsa Z., Cepel M. Linking firm characteristics to perceived important social factors for entrepreneurial activity. Economics and Sociology. 2019. № 12(4). Pр. 101–115. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/6.
42. Petrakis P. E, Valsamis D. G., Kafka K. I. From optimal to stagnant growth: the role of institutions and culture. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2017. Vol. 2. Is. 3. Pp. 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.011.
43. Lubacha-Sember J., Godlewska M. The role of local formal and informal institutions in microfirms’ development: evidence from Poland. Economics and Sociology. 2017. № 11. No. 3. Pр. 43–58. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/3.
44. Martínez J. B., Fernández M. L., Fernández P. M. Corporate social responsibility: evolution through institutional and stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Management and Business Economics. 2016. Vol. 25. Is. 1. Pp. 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2015.11.002.
45. Лозинська Т. До проблеми вживання термінів «інститут» і «інституція» в контексті інституціонального аналізу. Бізнес Інформ. 2014. № 7. С. 8–13. URL: https://www.business-inform.net/annotated-catalogue/?year=2014&abstract=2014_07_0.
46. Вовканич С. Й. Префекти в системі децентралізації влади: новий інститут, модерна інституція (організація) чи розвиток в Україні неоінституціоналізму? Регіональна економіка. 2016. № 2(80). С. 18–33. URL: https://re.gov.ua/doi/re2016.02.018_u.php.
47. Касториадис К. Воображаемое установление общества. Москва: Гнозис; Киев: Логос. 2003. 480 с. URL: http://library.khpg.org/files/docs/1385716028.pdf.
48. Дворецкий И. Х. Латинско-русский словарь. Москва: Русский язык, 1986. 843 с.
49. Сисоєв О. В. Поняття «інститут» та «інституція»: економічний контекст. Вісник Запорізького національного університету. 2014. № 3(23). С. 140–149. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vznu_eco_2014_3_18.
50. Макалюк І. В., Круш П. В. Управління трансакційними витратами промислових підприємств: методологія і практика: монографія. Київ: Кондор. 2019. 300 с.
51. Ong Ch. Z., Mohd-Rashid R., Taufil-Mohd K. N. Do institutional investors drive the IPO valuation? Borsa Istanbul Review. 2020. Vol. 20. No. 4. Pр. 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.05.003.
52. Wang Ch.-Y., Weng Y.-Ch., Wang L. Effect of air quality on corporate environmental disclosure: the moderating role of institutional investors. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2021. Vol. 21. No. 1. Pр. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.005.
53. Ibrahim Y., Ahmed I., Minai M. S. The Influence of institutional characteristics on financial performance of microfinance institutions in the OIC countries. Economics and Sociology. 2018. No. 11. No. 2. Pр. 19–35. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-2/2.
54. Wardhono A., Arifandi J. A., Indrawati Y. The opportunities and challenges of institutional arrangement for Besuki Na-Oogst tobacco cultivation business: case study in Jember Regency Indonesia. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2018. Vol. 4. No. 3. Pp. 44–54. URL: https://are-journal.com/are/article/view/183.
55. Про внесення змін до деяких законодавчих актів України щодо умов обігу земель сільськогосподарського призначення: Закон України від 31.03.2020 р. № 552-IX. Відомості Верховної ради України. 2020. № 20. C. 142. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/552-20#Text.
References
1. Aracil, E., Gómez-Bengoechea, G., & Moreno-de-Tejada, O. (2021). Institutional quality and the financial inclusion-poverty alleviation link: empirical evidence across countries. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(1), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.006.
2. Draskovic, M., Bauk, S., & Delibasic, M. (2016). Testing the level and factors of institutional rationality in Montenegro, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Economics and Sociology, 9(2), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/2.
3. Kaasa, A. (2016). Social capital, institutional quality and productivity: evidence from European regions. Economics and Sociology, 9(4), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/1.
4. Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2016). Quality of institutions for knowledge-based economy within new institutional economics framework. multiple criteria decision analysis for European countries in the years 2000–2013. Economics and Sociology, 9(4), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071- 789X.2016/9-4/4.
5. Danaj, A., Lazányi, K., & Bilan, Y. (2018). Perceptions and implications of immigration in France – economic, social, political and cultural perspectives. Economics and Sociology, 11(3), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/14.
6. Shkodra, J., Ymeri, P., & Ibishi, L. (2020). Role of microfinance institutions for developing women entrepreneurship – the case study of Kosovo. Economics and Sociology, 4(1), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2021/14-1/8.
7. Draskovic, M., Jovovic, R., Draskovic, V., & Jovovic, N. (2017). Levels and factors of transitional crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Serbia. Economics and Sociology, 1(2), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-2/2.
8. Jankowska, B., Di Maria, E., & Cygler, J. (2021). Do clusters matter for foreign subsidiaries in the Era of industry 4.0? The case of the aviation valley in Poland. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(2), 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100150.
9. Capellán, R., Ollero, J., & García Pozo, A. (2021). The influence of the real estate investment trust in the real estate sector on the Costa del Sol. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(1), 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.10.003.
10. Ahmed, F., Kousar, S., & Pervaiz, A. (2021). Do institutional quality and financial development affect sustainable economic growth? Evidence from South Asian countries. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(1), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.005.
11. Muye, M. I., & Muye, I. Yu. (2017). Testing for causality among globalization, institution and financial development: further evidence from three economic blocs. Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.10.001.
12. Nguyen, P. C., Schinckus, C., Dinh Su. T., & Chong, F. (2018). Institutions, inward foreign direct investment, trade openness and credit level in emerging market economies. Review of Development Finance, 8(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2018.11.005.
13. Maruta, A. A. (2019). Trade aid, institutional quality, and trade. Journal of Economics and Business, 103, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.12.001.
14. Chikalipah, S. (2018). Credit risk in microfinance industry: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Review of Development Finance, 8(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2018.05.004.
15. Gietzen, T. (2017). The exposure of microfinance institutions to financial risk. Review of Development Finance, 7(2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2017.04.001.
16. Donou-Adonsou, F., & Sylwester, K. (2016). Financial development and poverty reduction in developing countries: new evidence from banks and microfinance institutions. Review of Development Finance, 6(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2016.06.002.
17. Haliant, S. (2020). Institutional environment of functioning of gas distribution enterprises in the western region. Economic Journal of Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, 2(22), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.29038/2411-4014-2020-02-152-160.
18. Zapuhlyak, І. (2016). Institutional framework for the development of domestic gas transportation enterprises. Economic Annals-XXI, 158(3–4(2)), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V158-09.
19. Martynova, N. B. (2016). Institutional enforcement of competitive socio-economic policy in accordance with EU requirements. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 5(2), 220–225. Available at: http://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/pdf/ekon/pdfbase/2016/VKNU-ES-2016-N5-Volume2_240.pdf.
20. Obushna, N. I. (2016). Features of the categorical apparatus of institutional theory in the state administration plane. Manager. Bulletin of Donetsk State University of Management, 1, 40–48. Available at: https://ojs.dsum.edu.ua/index.php/manager/article/view/289.
21. Prokopenko, N., Vykliuk, M., & Skoryk, M. (2016). Mechanism of state regulation of the agrarian sector of the economy: institutional aspect. Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 3(48), 2, 263–270. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efdu_2016_3_32.
22. Stryzhak, O. O. (2016). Theoretical bases of research of the institutional environment of human development. Visnyk KrNU imeni Mykhaila Ostrohradskoho, 4(99), 115–123. Available at: http://www.kdu.edu.ua/PUBL/statti/2016_4_115-4-2016.pdf.
23. Tymofiiiv, T. (2016). Institutional maintenance of the milk productive subcomplexfunctioning. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2(1), 142–151. Available at: https://are-journal.com/are/article/view/27.
24. Shvedovsky, V., Standrik, A., Bilan, Y. (2016). Economic and social institutions: modelling the evolution paths for the archaic society. Economics and Sociology, 9(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-2/9.
25. Best, M. (2002). Novaja konkurencija. Instituty promyshlennogo razvitija [New competition. Institutes of Industrial Development]. Moscow, TEIS. Available at: https://altairbook.com/books/1276613-novaya-konkurenciya-instituty-promyshlennogo-razvitiya.html.
26. Jeggertsson, T. (2001). Ekonomicheskoe povedenie i instituty [Economic behavior and institutions]. Moscow, Delo. Available at: http://www.library.fa.ru/files/Eggertsson.pdf.
27. North, D. (1997). Instituty, institucional'nye izmenenija i funkcionirovanie jekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance] (A. N. Nesterenko, Trans.). Moscow, Fond jekonomicheskoj knigi «Nachala».
28. Hodgson, G. (2003). Jekonomicheskaja teorija i instituty: manifest sovremennoj institucional'noj jekonomicheskoj teorii [Economics and institutions: a manifesto for a modern institutional economics]. Moscow, Delo.
29. Furubotn, Je. G., & Rihter, R. (2005). Instituty i jekonomicheskaja teorija: dostizhenija novoj institucional'noj jekonomicheskoj teorii [Institutions and economic theory: the contribution of the new institutional economics], (V. S. Katkalo, N. P. Drozdova, Trans. Eds). St. Petersburg, Izd. dom SPbGU.
30. Frolov, D. (2008). Jevoljucionnaja perspektiva institucional'noj jekonomiki Rossii [Evolutionary perspective of the institutional economy of Russia]. Volgograd, VolGU.
31. Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the leisure class: an economic study of institutions. New York, The Macmillan Company. Available at: https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Veblen/Veblen_1899/Veblen_1899_toc.html.
32. Veblen, T. (1984). The Theory of the Leisure Clas (S. T. Sorokyna Trans). Moscow, Progress.
33. Zotov, V. V., Presnjakov, V. F., & Rozental, V. O. (2001). Institutional problems of implementing system functions of the economy. Jekonomicheskaja nauka sovremennoj Rossii, 3, 35–41.
34. Marks, K. (1951). Kapital. Kritika politicheskoj jekonomii. T. 1. Kn. 1. Process proizvodstva kapitala [Capital. Criticism of political economy. Vol. 1. Book 1. Capital production process]. Moscow, Gospolitizdat.
35. Kirdina, S. G., & Malkov, S. Ju. (2008). Modeling the self-organization of the economy of industries with increasing and lower limit costs. Evolutionary theory, theory of sprucement and economic development: 7th International Symposium on Evolutionary Economics. Moscow, Institute of Economics RAN.
36. Inshakov, O. V. (2010). Institution and institute: problems of categorical differentiation and integration. JeNSR, 3(50), 26–38.
37. Busel, V. T. Ed. (2005). Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy [Great interpretation dictionary of modern Ukrainian language]. Kyiv, VTF «Perun».
38. Karmazina, M., & Shurbovana, O. (2006). «Institute» and «Institution»: the problem of distinguishing concepts. Politychnyi menedzhment, 4, 10–19. Available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/9611/02-Karmazina.pdf?sequence=1.
39. Majburd, M. E. (1996). Vvedenie v istoriju jekonomicheskoj mysli. Ot prorokov do professorov [An introduction to the history of economic thought. From prophets to professors]. Moscow, Delo & Vita-Press.
40. Buriak, A., Vozňáková, I., Sułkowska, J., & Kryvych, Y. (2019). Social trust and institutional (bank) trust: empirical evidence of interaction. Economics and Sociology, 12(4), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/7.
41. Çera, G., Belas, J., Rozsa, Z., & Cepel, M. (2019). Linking firm characteristics to perceived important social factors for entrepreneurial activity. Economics and Sociology, 12(4), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/6.
42. Petrakis, P. E., Valsamis, D. G., & Kafka, K. I. (2017). From optimal to stagnant growth: the role of institutions and culture. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(3), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.011.
43. Lubacha-Sember, J., & Godlewska, M. (2017). The role of local formal and informal institutions in microfirms’ development: evidence from Poland. Economics and Sociology, 11(3), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/3.
44. Martínez, J. B., Fernández, M. L., & Fernández, P. M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: evolution through institutional and stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2015.11.002.
45. Lozynska, T. (2014). To the problem of using the terms «Institute» and «Institution» in the context of institutional analysis. Business Inform, 7, 8–13. Available at: https://www.business-inform.net/annotated-catalogue/?year=2014&abstract=2014_07_0.
46. Vovkanych, S. Y. (2016). Prefects in the system of decentralization of power: new institute, modern institution (organization) or development of neinstitutionalism in Ukraine? Rehionalna ekonomika, 2(80), 18–33. Available at: https://re.gov.ua/doi/re2016.02.018_u.php.
47. Kastoriadis, K. (2003). Voobrazhaemoe ustanovlenie obshhestva [Imaginary establishment of society]. Gnozis, Moscow; Logos, Kyiv.
48. Dvoreckij, I. H. (1986). Latinsko-russkij slovar' [Latin-Russian dictionary]. Moscow, Russkij jazyk.
49. Sysoiev, O. V. (2014). The concept of “Institute” and “Institution”: economic context. Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 3(23), 140–149. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vznu_eco_2014_3_18.
50. Makaliuk, I. V., & Krush, P. V. (2019). Upravlinnia transaktsiinymy vytratamy promyslovykh pidpryiemstv: metodolohiia i praktyka [Management of transaction costs of industrial enterprises: methodology and practice], Kyiv, Kondor.
51. Ong, Ch. Z., Mohd-Rashid, R., & Taufil-Mohd, K. N. (2020). Do institutional investors drive the IPO valuation? Borsa Istanbul Review, 20(4), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.05.003.
52. Wang, Ch.-Y., Weng, Y.-Ch., & Wang, L. (2021). Effect of air quality on corporate environmental disclosure: the moderating role of institutional investors. Borsa Istanbul Review, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.005.
53. Ibrahim, Y., Ahmed, I., & Minai, M. S. (2018). The influence of institutional characteristics on financial performance of microfinance institutions in the OIC countries. Economics and Sociology, 11(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-2/2.
54. Wardhono, A., Arifandi, J. A., & Indrawati, Y. (2018). The opportunities and challenges of institutional arrangement for Besuki Na-Oogst tobacco cultivation business: case study in Jember Regency Indonesia. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 4(3), 44–54. Available at: https://are-journal.com/are/article/view/183.
55. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2020), The Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine regarding the terms of circulation of agricultural land”. Vidomosti Verhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 20. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/552-20#Text.
Published
2022-03-20
How to Cite
Makaliuk, I., Zhaldak, H., & Martynenko, V. (2022). “Institution” and “institute”: tendency to the “false substitution” of concepts. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 8(1), 204-234. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2022.08.01.11
Issue
Section
Articles
