Assessment of the readiness of agrarian enterprises to implement innovative projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2023.09.01.11Keywords:
management of innovative projects, project maturity, readiness, agricultural sector, sustainable development.Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the results of the assessment and analysis of trends, the current state and sectoral features of the readiness of agrarian enterprises of various sizes to implement and manage innovative projects.
Methodology / approach. This study uses the following methods: bibliometric and cluster analysis using the VOSviewer program – to determine the status and clustering of studies based on the Scopus database; statistical methods of data normalization (by the range of variation, relative to the standard, using the sigmoid function) – for assessing the readiness of agrarian enterprises to implement and manage innovative projects; correlation analysis – to identify the degree of coincidence of results calculated by different methods of data normalization; mathematical alignment of dynamic series – to determine trends of change and predict the readiness of enterprises to implement innovative projects; descriptive statistics and graphical – for a visual representation of the obtained results; monographic and abstract-logical – to generalize the evaluation results. The empirical basis of the study was data from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine and data from 46 agrarian enterprises of the Kharkiv region.
Results. Approbation of the methodology for determining the readiness of agrarian enterprises to implement and manage innovative projects confirmed the practical suitability of its application, made it possible to compare the results calculated by different methods of data normalization, and also made it possible to identify and analyze the actual level and dynamics of the indicated readiness. If current trends continue, it is predicted that the integrated indicator of readiness of Ukrainian enterprises will increase in 2025 to 81.5 points in the field of crop production, and to 54.9 points in the field of livestock production. In general, in the agricultural sector and in animal husbandry, in particular, large enterprises had a higher integral indicator of readiness for the implementation of innovative projects than medium and small enterprises, and medium enterprises are characterized by relatively lower readiness. In crop production, small enterprises were distinguished by a relatively higher level of readiness, the second position was occupied by large ones, but the differences between them were not as significant as in livestock production. A very low and low level of readiness for the implementation of innovative projects and their management is inherent in the vast majority of the studied agrarian enterprises of the Kharkiv region, and therefore needs to be improved.
Originality / scientific novelty. For the first time, the readiness of agrarian enterprises to implement innovative projects and their management was evaluated, which made it possible to identify the trends, current state, and industry specifics of this readiness in general and in terms of large, medium, small, including micro-enterprises. Methodological provisions on assessing the readiness of agrarian enterprises to implement and manage innovative projects was further developed in terms of comparing assessments obtained using different methods of data standardization.
Practical value / implications. The results of the research can be used for (i) improving the policy on improving the readiness for the implementation of innovative projects and their management, taking into account industry characteristics and the size of enterprises in the agrarian sector; (ii) assessment of reserves for improving the indicated readiness and forecasting its level, taking into account the possible increase of regulated factors; (iii) adoption by managers of agrarian enterprises of managerial decisions on increasing their readiness for the implementation of innovative projects and their management.
References
Józwiak W., Kagan A., Mirkowska Z. Innovations on the Polish farms, their scope of implementation and significance. Problems of Agricultural Economics. 2014. Vol. 341. No. 4. Pp. 82–104. https://doi.org/10.5604/00441600.1151765.
Zastempowski M., Cyfert S. The role of strategic innovation activities in creating Spanish agriculture companies’ innovativeness. Agricultural Economics – Czech. 2022. Vol. 68. Pp. 230–238. https://doi.org/10.17221/66/2022-AGRICECON.
Stræte E. P., Vik J., Fuglestad E. M., Gjefsen M. D. et al. Critical support for different stages of innovation in agriculture: what, when, how? Agricultural Systems. 2022. Vol. 203. 103526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103526.
Кучер Л. Ю. Економічні засади управління інноваційними проєктами підприємств аграрного сектора: теорія та практика: моногр. Харків: Бровін О. В., 2021. 640 с. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26283.92969.
Karim M. A., Ong T. S., Ng S. H., Muhammad H., Ali N. A. Organizational aspects and practices for enhancing organizational project management maturity. Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14. Is. 9. 5113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095113.
Рейтинг та тренди проєктного менеджменту 2015. URL: http://www.management.com.ua/tend/tend747.html.
Ameer A., Naz F., Gul Taj B., Ameer I. The impact of manager’s personality traits on project success through affective professional commitment: the moderating role of organizational project management maturity system. Journal of Facilities Management. 2022. Vol. 20. Is. 2. Pp. 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-02-2021-0020.
Jawad S., Ledwith A. A measurement model of project control systems success for engineering and construction projects case study: contractor companies in Saudi’s petroleum and chemical industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2022. Vol. 29. Is. 3. Pp. 1218–1240. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2020-0924.
Varajão J., Marques R. P., Trigo A. Project management processes – impact on the success of information systems projects. Informatica. 2022. Vol. 33. Is. 2. Pp. 421–436. https://doi.org/10.15388/22-INFOR488.
Alghail A., Yao L., Abbas M. Will knowledge infrastructure capabilities elevate the project management maturity? an empirical study. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-12-2021-0289.
Alghail A., Yao L., Abbas M., Baashar Y. Assessment of knowledge process capabilities toward project management maturity: an empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2022. Vol. 26. Is. 5. Pp. 1207–1234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2021-0180.
Liao R., Chen H., Sun C., Sun Y. An exploratory study on two-dimensional project management maturity model. Engineering Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2022.2154093.
Sun C., Chen H., Long R., Liao R. Research on BIM application two-dimensional maturity model. Buildings. 2022. Vol. 12. Is. 11. 1960 https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111960.
Gareeb N., Rwelamila P. D. Rethinking project management maturity models for the south african power sector. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. 2022. Vol. 14. Is. 3. Pp. 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1899558.
Htoo T. T., Dodanwala T. C., Santoso D. S. Project management maturity and performance of building construction projects in myanmar. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction. 2023. Vol. 28. Is. 1. https://doi.org/10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1192.
Machado F., Duarte N., & Amaral A. Project management maturity in renovation and remodelling construction firms. Buildings. 2023. Vol. 13. Is. 2. 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020557.
Fajsi A., Morača S., Milosavljević M., Medić N. Project management maturity and business excellence in the context of industry 4.0. Processes. 2022. Vol. 10. Is. 6. 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10061155.
Alyamani R., Long S., Nurunnabi M. Evaluating decision making in sustainable project selection between literature and practice. Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13. Is. 15. 8216. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158216.
Dobni C. B., Wilson G. A. Measuring cultural readiness for innovation: six essential questions. Journal of Business Strategy. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-09-2022-0168.
Galvez D., Enjolras M., Camargo M., Boly V., Claire J. Firm readiness level for innovation projects: a new decision-making tool for innovation managers. Administrative Sciences. 2018. Vol. 8. No. 1. 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8010006.
Orozco R., Grundmann P. Readiness for innovation of emerging grass-based businesses. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2022. Vol. 8. Is. 4. 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040180.
Jamai K., Abidar A., De Steur H., Gellynck X. Assessing firm readiness to adopt cluster-based innovative projects: a segmentation analysis. Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14. Is. 2. 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020947.
Jankelova N., Joniakova Z., Blstakova J., Nemethova I. Readiness of human resource departments of agricultural enterprises for implementation of the new roles of human resource professionals. Agricultural Economics – Czech. 2017. Vol. 63. Pp. 461–470. https://doi.org/10.17221/189/2016-AGRICECON.
Shen J. An exploratory study on project management maturity assessment for agricultural enterprises. Journal of System and Management Sciences. 2021. Vol. 11. No. 3. Pp. 235–245. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2021.0312.
Bushuyev S., Verenych O. Organizational maturity and project: program and portfolio success. Developing organizational maturity for effective project management; eds. G. Silvius, G. Karayaz. IGI Global, 2018. Pp. 104–127. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3197-5.ch006.
Bushuyev S. D., Wagner F. R. IPMA delta and IPMA organisational competence baseline (OCB): new approaches in the field of project management maturity. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 2014. Vol. 7. No. 2. Pp. 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2013-0049.
Voitenko O., Chernova L., Chernova L., Timinsky A. 4K-model as a basis of improving project management maturity in the organization. International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies. 2021. Vol. 2. Pp. 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSIT52700.2021.9648708.
Fesenko T., Fesenko G. Developing gender maturity models of project and program management system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2017. Vol. 1. No. 3-85. Pp. 46–55. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.28031.
Blyznyuk A., Melnyk I., Hrinchenko Y., Solomko A., Lernyk S., Moshak O. Formation the project maturity of public administration in implementation of digital transformation projects. Journal of Information Technology Management. 2021. Vol. 13. Pp. 163–187. https://doi.org/10.22059/JITM.2021.82615.
Bondarenko S., Halachenko O., Shmorgun L., Volokhova I. et al. The effectiveness of network systems in providing project maturity of public management. TEM Journal. 2021. Vol. 10. Is. 1. Pp. 272–282. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM101-34.
Fesenko T., Fesenko G. E-readiness evaluation modelling for monitoring the national e-government programme (by the example of Ukraine). Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2016. Vol. 3. No. 3-81. Pp. 28–35. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71606.
Redko N., Matyushenko I. Y. The assessment of Ukraine’s readiness for innovations in the conditions of the spread of technologies of the new industrial revolution. Acta Innovations. 2019. Vol. 33. Pp. 5–19. https://doi.org/10.32933/ActaInnovations.33.1.
Sharko M., Liubchuk O., Krapivina G., Petrushenko N. et al. (2023). Information technology to assess the enterprises’ readiness for innovative transformations using Markov Chains; eds. S. Babichev, V. Lytvynenko. Lecture Notes in Data Engineering, Computational Intelligence, and Decision Making. ISDMCI 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol. 149. Springer, Cham. Pp. 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16203-9_12.
Rogito J. M., Nyamota G. Cross-cultural differences in leadership and management of agricultural projects in Africa. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 6. Is. 2. 01. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2022.06.02.01.
Улько Є. Організаційно-економічні основи управління проєктами землевпорядкувань агробізнесу щодо забезпечення сталості агроекосистем. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 6. No. 3. 06. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2022.06.03.06.
Мальцев О. Логістичне забезпечення сталого розвитку аграрного сектора: проектний підхід. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 5. No. 1. 04. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2021.05.01.04.
Horin N. Support of eco-innovation projects in agriculture: case of Poland. Problems of World Agriculture. 2016. Vol. 16(31). No. 4. Pp. 123–130. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.253047.
Heldak M., Kucher A., Stacherzak A., Kucher L. Structural transformations in agriculture in Poland and Ukraine: towards economic sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism. 2018. Vol. IX. No. 8(32). Pp. 1827–1841. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v9.8(32).24.
Кучер Л., Кучер A., Морозова Г., Пащенко Ю. Розвиток циркулярної аграрної економіки: потенційні джерела фінансування інноваційних проєктів. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2022. Vol. 8. No. 2. Pp. 206–227. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2022.08.02.11.
Карпенко А. Між земельним ринком та привидом світової кризи: фінансовий стан трьох найбільших агрохолдингів. URL: https://agravery.com/uk/posts/show/miz-zemelnim-rinkom-ta-prividom-svitovoi-krizi-finansovij-stan-troh-najbilsih-agroholdingiv.
Офіційний сайт платформи Landlord. URL: https://landlord.ua/reytingi/reiting_reputacii-i-finansovoiy-nadezhnosti-agroholdingov.
Forbes склав рейтинг найефективніших агрокомпаній України. URL: https://bakertilly.ua/ru/news/id37986.
Тимчук В. М. Іодковський В. С., Усова З. В. Урожайність потенційна і реальна. Зерно. 2017. № 8(137). С. 26–32. URL: https://www.zerno-ua.com/journals/2017/avgust-2017-god/urozhaynist-potenciyna-i-realna.
Зеліско І. М. Інноваційні імперативи розвитку інтеграційних аграрних формувань. Науковий вісник ЛНУВМБТ імені С. З. Гжицького. 2012. Т. 14. № 1 (51). Ч. 1. С. 264–270.
Чемерис В., Душка В., Максим В. Розвиток інноваційної інфраструктури аграрного виробництва Львівської області. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2017. Vol. 3. No. 2. Pp. 145–158. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2017.03.02.12.
Zarbà C., Chinnici G., Pecorino B., D’Amico M. Paradigm of the circular economy in agriculture: the case of vegetable seedlings for transplantation in nursery farms. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM. 2019. Vol. 19(4.2). Pp. 113–120. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019V/4.2/S05.0163.
Страпчук С. І. Сталий розвиток аграрних підприємств на засадах циркулярної економіки: моногр. Харків: ДБТУ; Львів: Новий Світ – 2000, 2022. 380 с.
References
Józwiak, W., Kagan, A., & Mirkowska, Z. (2014). Innovations on the Polish farms, their scope of implementation and significance. Problems of Agricultural Economics, 341(4), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.5604/00441600.1151765.
Zastempowski, M., & Cyfert, S. (2022). The role of strategic innovation activities in creating Spanish agriculture companies’ innovativeness. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 68, 230–238. https://doi.org/10.17221/66/2022-AGRICECON.
Stræte, E. P., Vik, J., Fuglestad, E. M., Gjefsen, M. D., Melås, A. M., & Søraa, R. A. (2022). Critical support for different stages of innovation in agriculture: what, when, how? Agricultural Systems, 203, 103526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103526.
Kucher, L. Yu. (2021). Ekonomichni zasady upravlinnya innovatsiynymy proyektamy pidpryyemstv ahrarnoho sektora: teoriya ta praktyka [Economic bases of management of innovative projects of enterprises of agrarian sector: theory and practice]. Kharkiv, Publisher Brovin. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26283.92969.
Karim, M. A., Ong, T. S., Ng, S. H., Muhammad, H., & Ali, N. A. (2022). Organizational aspects and practices for enhancing organizational project management maturity. Sustainability, 14(9), 5113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095113.
Rating and trends of project management 2015 (n.d.). Available at: http://www.management.com.ua/tend/tend747.html.
Ameer, A., Naz, F., Gul Taj, B., & Ameer, I. (2022). The impact of manager’s personality traits on project success through affective professional commitment: the moderating role of organizational project management maturity system. Journal of Facilities Management, 20(2), 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-02-2021-0020.
Jawad, S., & Ledwith, A. (2022). A measurement model of project control systems success for engineering and construction projects case study: contractor companies in Saudi’s petroleum and chemical industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(3), 1218–1240. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2020-0924.
Varajão, J., Marques, R. P., & Trigo, A. (2022). Project management processes – impact on the success of information systems projects. Informatica, 33(2), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.15388/22-INFOR488.
Alghail, A., Yao, L., & Abbas, M. (2022). Will knowledge infrastructure capabilities elevate the project management maturity? an empirical study. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-12-2021-0289.
Alghail, A., Yao, L., Abbas, M., & Baashar, Y. (2022). Assessment of knowledge process capabilities toward project management maturity: an empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(5), 1207–1234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2021-0180.
Liao, R., Chen, H., Sun, C., & Sun, Y. (2022). An exploratory study on two-dimensional project management maturity model. Engineering Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2022.2154093.
Sun, C., Chen, H., Long, R., & Liao, R. (2022). Research on BIM application two-dimensional maturity model. Buildings, 12(11), 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111960.
Gareeb, N., & Rwelamila, P. D. (2022). Rethinking project management maturity models for the south african power sector. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 14(3), 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1899558.
Htoo, T. T., Dodanwala, T. C., & Santoso, D. S. (2023). Project management maturity and performance of building construction projects in Myanmar. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1192.
Machado, F., Duarte, N., & Amaral, A. (2023). Project management maturity in renovation and remodelling construction firms. Buildings, 13(2), 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020557.
Fajsi, A., Morača, S., Milosavljević, M., & Medić, N. (2022). Project management maturity and business excellence in the context of industry 4.0. Processes, 10(6), 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10061155.
Alyamani, R., Long, S., & Nurunnabi, M. (2021). Evaluating decision making in sustainable project selection between literature and practice. Sustainability, 13(15), 8216. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158216.
Dobni, C. B., & Wilson, G. A. (2023). Measuring cultural readiness for innovation: six essential questions. Journal of Business Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-09-2022-0168.
Galvez, D., Enjolras, M., Camargo, M., Boly, V., & Claire, J. (2018). Firm readiness level for innovation projects: a new decision-making tool for innovation managers. Administrative Sciences, 8(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8010006.
Orozco, R., & Grundmann, P. (2022). Readiness for innovation of emerging grass-based businesses. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040180.
Jamai, K., Abidar, A., De Steur, H., & Gellynck, X. (2022). Assessing firm readiness to adopt cluster-based innovative projects: a segmentation analysis. Sustainability, 14(2), 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020947.
Jankelova, N., Joniakova, Z., Blstakova, J., & Nemethova, I. (2017). Readiness of human resource departments of agricultural enterprises for implementation of the new roles of human resource professionals. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 63, 461–470. https://doi.org/10.17221/189/2016-AGRICECON.
Shen, J. (2021). An exploratory study on project management maturity assessment for agricultural enterprises. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 11(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2021.0312.
Bushuyev, S., & Verenych, O. (2018). Organizational maturity and project: Program and portfolio success. In G. Silvius and G. Karayaz (Eds.), Developing organizational maturity for effective project management (pp. 104–127). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3197-5.ch006.
Bushuyev, D. S., & Wagner, F.R. (2014). IPMA delta and IPMA organisational competence baseline (OCB): new approaches in the field of project management maturity. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7(2), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2013-0049.
Voitenko, O., Chernova, L., Chernova, L., & Timinsky, A. (2021). 4K-model as a basis of improving project management maturity in the organization. International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, 2, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSIT52700.2021.9648708.
Fesenko, T., & Fesenko, G. (2017). Developing gender maturity models of project and program management system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(3-85), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.28031.
Blyznyuk, A., Melnyk, I., Hrinchenko, Y., Solomko, A., Lernyk, S., & Moshak, O. (2021). Formation the project maturity of public administration in implementation of digital transformation projects. Journal of Information Technology Management, 13, 163–187. https://doi.org/10.22059/JITM.2021.82615.
Bondarenko, S., Halachenko, O., Shmorgun, L., Volokhova, I., Khomutenko, A., & Krainov, V. (2021). The effectiveness of network systems in providing project maturity of public management. TEM Journal, 10(1), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM101-34.
Fesenko, T., & Fesenko, G. (2016). E-readiness evaluation modelling for monitoring the national e-government programme (by the example of Ukraine). Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(3-81), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71606.
Redko, N., & Matyushenko, I. Y. (2019). The assessment of Ukraine’s readiness for innovations in the conditions of the spread of technologies of the new industrial revolution. Acta Innovations, 33, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.32933/ActaInnovations.33.1.
Sharko, M., Liubchuk, O., Krapivina, G., Petrushenko, N., Gonchar, O., Vorobyova, K., Vasylenko, N. (2023). Information technology to assess the enterprises’ readiness for innovative transformations using Markov Chains. In S. Babichev and V. Lytvynenko (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Data Engineering, Computational Intelligence, and Decision Making (pp. 197–213). ISDMCI 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol. 149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16203-9_12.
Rogito, J. M., & Nyamota, G. (2022). Cross-cultural differences in leadership and management of agricultural projects in Africa. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 6(2), 01. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2022.06.02.01.
Ulko, Y. (2022). Organizational and economic basis of management projects of land planning in agribusiness to ensure the sustainable of agroecosystems. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 6(3), 06. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2022.06.03.06.
Maltsev, O. (2021). Logistics support for the sustainable development of the agrarian sector: a project approach. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 5(1), 04. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2021.05.01.04.
Horin, N. (2016). Support of eco-innovation projects in agriculture: case of Poland. Problems of World Agriculture, 16(31)4), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.253047.
Heldak, M., Kucher, A., Stacherzak, A., & Kucher, L. (2018). Structural transformations in agriculture in Poland and Ukraine: towards economic sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, IX(8(32)), 1827–1841. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v9.8(32).24.
Kucher, L., Kucher, A., Morozova, H., & Pashchenko, Yu. (2022). Development of circular agricultural economy: potential sources of financing innovative projects. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 8(2), 206–227. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2022.08.02.11.
Karpenko, A. (2019). Between the land market and the specter of the global crisis: the financial condition of the three largest agricultural holdings. Available at: https://agravery.com/uk/posts/show/miz-zemelnim-rinkom-ta-prividom-svitovoi-krizi-finansovij-stan-troh-najbilsih-agroholdingiv.
Landlord (n.d.). Official site. Available at: https://landlord.ua/reytingi/reiting_reputacii-i-finansovoiy-nadezhnosti-agroholdingov.
Forbes compiled a rating of the most efficient agricultural companies of Ukraine (n.d.). Available at: https://bakertilly.ua/ru/news/id37986.
Tymchuk, V. M., Iodkovskyi, V. S., & Usova, Z. V. (2017). Yield potential and real. Zerno, 8(137), 26–32. Available at: https://www.zerno-ua.com/journals/2017/avgust-2017-god/urozhaynist-potenciyna-i-realna.
Zelisko, I. M. (2012). Innovative imperatives for the development of integration agrarian formations. Scientific Messenger of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, 14(1(51)), 264–270.
Chemerys, V., Dushka, V., & Maksym, V. (2017). Development of innovation infrastructure of agricultural production Lviv area. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 3(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2017.03.02.12
Zarbà, C., Chinnici, G., Pecorino, B., & D’Amico, M. (2019). Paradigm of the circular economy in agriculture: the case of vegetable seedlings for transplantation in nursery farms. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM. 19(4.2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019V/4.2/S05.0163.
Strapchuk, S. I. (2022). Stalyi rozvytok ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv na zasadakh tsyrkuliarnoi ekonomiky [Sustainable development of agricultural enterprises on the basis of circular economy]. Lviv, Novyi Svit – 2000.
