Influence of energy efficiency of forestry enterprises on forestry land use indicators


Keywords: energy efficiency, forestry lands, forestry land use, energy intensity.

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this work is to improve the system of impact of energy efficiency of forestry enterprises on ensuring the balance of ecological and economic indicators of the use of forestry land.

Methodology / approach. The following methods are used: dialectical method of cognition; method of analogies; statistical; graphic; abstract and logical. The information base of the research is the data of the Global Forest Resources Assessment of FAO 2020, the State Statistics Service of Ukraine, the reporting of the State Forestry Agency of Ukraine, the data of the Forest Stewardship Council®. The reporting indicators of the State Forestry Agency of Ukraine, under whose departmental authority 73 % of the forest lands of Ukraine are located, were studied for 2016–2021. The reporting is detailed for 24 regional forestry and hunting managements, which are subordinate to the State Forestry Agency of Ukraine and are its territorial bodies. The methodology for ensuring the energy efficiency of forestry land use is based on the implementation of strategic imperatives of energy efficiency of forestry land use, which provides for the improvement of the State Forest Management Strategy of Ukraine until 2035.

Results. The influence of the energy efficiency of forestry enterprises on ensuring the balance of forestry land use indicators has been studied, and proposals have been made for ways to increase the energy efficiency of forestry enterprises. According to data from 2016 to 2021, the dynamics of consumption of fuel and energy resources by forestry enterprises under the departmental subordination of the State Agency of Forest Resources of Ukraine was determined; an economic measurement of the energy efficiency of forestry activities was carried out; an assessment of the impact of energy efficiency on the effectiveness of forestry land use indicators was carried out. It was established that the indicators of the energy intensity of the products sold by the state forestry farms under the management of the State Forestry Agency of Ukraine for 2016–2021 had a positive trend of decrease in 21 regions, and increased in 3 regions. The range of reduction in the energy intensity of sold products for 2016–2021 by region was from 2.7 % to 55.7 %. The assessment of the impact of energy intensity on the profitability of state forestry enterprises of the State Forestry Agency of Ukraine on average for 2016–2021 was carried out, which showed an inverse relationship with a correlation coefficient of r = -0.7128. It has been proven that increasing the energy efficiency of forestry enterprises is a favorable factor in balancing the ecological and economic indicators of the use of forestry land. Reasoned strategic imperatives for increasing the energy efficiency of forestry activities are proposed in order to ensure the balance of ecological and economic indicators of the use of forestry land. It is proposed to improve the State Forest Management Strategy of Ukraine until 2035 regarding the strategic imperatives of ensuring the energy efficiency of forestry land use. All this will make it possible to develop the energy efficiency of forestry enterprises in order to ensure the balance of ecological and economic indicators of the use of forestry land.

Originality / scientific novelty. The need to increase the energy efficiency of forestry enterprises in order to ensure the balance of indicators of the use of forestry land in modern conditions has been proven. Aspects of ensuring the energy efficiency of forestry land use are substantiated, which is based on the implementation of strategic imperatives of energy efficiency of forestry land use, which provides for the improvement of the State Forest Management Strategy of Ukraine until 2035, in particular: encouraging investments aimed at technological re-equipment and technical modernization of forestry land use; reduction of the energy intensity of the gross domestic product of the forestry industry; diversification of consumption of energy resources, growth of the share of consumption of ecologically clean energy.

Practical value / implications. The scientific results of the study have important practical significance for improving the management of forests in Ukraine, which will ensure the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals at the national level, defined by the strategy of the state environmental policy of Ukraine. The national strategic imperatives of increasing the energy efficiency of forestry enterprises will contribute to the balance of indicators of the use of forestry land in modern conditions.

References

Stativka N., Lialina N. Formation of the organizational-economic mechanism of agricultural enterprises energy efficiency. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2017. Vol. 3. No. 2. Pp. 56–64. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2017.03.02.05.

Третяк В. М., Капінос Н. О. Поняття та сутність природоохоронного землекористування в системі суспільних відносин. Економіка та держава. 2022. № 5. С. 28–36. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2022.5.28.

Бородіна O. Базові тренди повоєнної трансформації економіки України: бюджетна децентралізація, індустрія 4.0, регіональний енергоменеджмент. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 6. No. 1. 04. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2022.06.01.04.

Celani de Macedo A., Cantore N., Barbier L., Matteini M., Pasqualetto G. The impact of industrial energy efficiency on economicand social indicators. FEEM Working Paper. 2020. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3654037.

Lu C-C., Lin I-F., Wu D., Zhang X. The effect of forestry on energy efficiency in EU countries: a nonoriented dynamic slack-based data envelopment analysis. Energy Science Engineering. 2021. Vol. 9. Is. 8. Pp. 1148–1159. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.879.

Пришляк Н. Виробництво біогазу в індивідуальних біогазових установках: досвід Індії та перспективи для України. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2019. Vol. 5. No. 1. Pp.122–136. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2019.05.01.08.

Giraudet L.-G., Missemer A. The economics of energy efficiency, a historical perspective. Working Papers halshs-02301636, HAL. 2019. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-02301636.html.

Калюжна О. В., Пушкаревський А. В., Хижняк Д. В. Зарубіжний досвід використання енергозберігаючих технологій в сільському господарстві. Modern Economics. 2017. № 6. С. 78–84. URL: https://modecon.mnau.edu.ua/zarubizhnyi-dosvid-vykorystannia-enerhozberihaiuchykh-tekhnolohii.

Johansson J., Ranius Th. Biomass outtake and bioenergy development in Sweden: the role of policy and economic presumptions. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2019. Vol. 34. Is. 8. Pp. 771–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2019.1691645.

Eggers J., Melin Y., Lundström J., Bergström D., Öhman K. Management strategies for wood fuel harvesting – trade-offs with biodiversity and forest ecosystem services. Sustainability. 2020. Vol.12(10). 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104089.

Dorohan-Pysarenko L., Rębilas R., Yehorova O., Yasnolob I., Kononenko Z. Methodological peculiarities of probability estimation of bankruptcy of agrarian enterprises in Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2021. Vol. 7. No. 2. Pp. 20–39. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2021.07.02.02.

Al Sharari F., Yemelyanov O., Dziurakh Yu., Sokil O., Danylovych O. The energy-saving projects’ impact on the level of an enterprise’s financial stability. Economic Annals-XXI. 2022. Vol. 195. No. 1–2. Pp. 36–49. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V195-04.

Костирко Л., Костирко Р., Середа О., Чернодубова Е. Фінансове забезпечення сталого розвитку підприємств в умовах економіко-екологічних імператив. Фінансово-кредитна діяльність: проблеми теорії та практики. 2021. Т. 4. № 39. С. 87–98. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i39.241295.

Шуплат О., Шевченко В., Луців Н., Некрасов С. та ін. Фінансування відтворення основних фондів деревообробних підприємств: інноваційно-інвестиційний аспект. Фінансово-кредитна діяльність: проблеми теорії та практики. 2022. Т. 4. № 45. С. 48–57. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.45.2022.3801.

Дмитренко А., Фурманчук О., Кравченко О., Карпенко Є. та ін. Макроекономічний аналіз та прогнозування залучення прямих іноземних інвестицій: приклад України. Фінансово-кредитна діяльність: проблеми теорії та практики. 2022. Т. 6. № 47. С. 66–76. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.6.47.2022.3926.

Онегіна В., Вітковський Ю. Інвестиції та земельна реформа в сільському господарстві в Україні. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2020. Vol. 6. No. 4. Pp. 187–210. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.04.10.

Пластун О., Єльнікова Ю., Шелюк A., Воронцова A. та ін. (2020). Роль державної інвестиційної політики та відповідального інвестування у фінансуванні сталого розвитку. Agricultural and Resource Economics. Vol. 6. No. 2. Pp. 108–125. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.02.07.

Кучер Л., Кучер А., Морозова Г., Пащенко Ю. Розвиток циркулярної аграрної економіки: потенційні джерела фінансування інноваційних проєктів. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2022. Vol. 8. No. 2. Pp. 206–227. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2022.08.02.11.

Centrum Koordynacji Projektów Środowiskowych. Lasy Węglowe. URL: https://www.ckps.lasy.gov.pl/projekty-energetyczne-lp.

Material- und Energieeffizienz. URL: https://www.charta-fuer-holz.de/charta-handlungsfelder/material-und-energieeffizienz.

Про схвалення Енергетичної стратегії України на період до 2035 року «Безпека, енергоефективність, конкурентоспроможність»: Розпорядження Кабінету Міністрів України від 18.08.2017 р. № 605-р. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/605-2017-%D1%80#Text.

Державна служба статистики України. Капітальні інвестиції. URL: http://ukrstat.gov.ua.

Стратегія низьковуглецевого розвитку України до 2050 року. URL: https://razumkov.energy/files/docs/Proekt/LEDS_ua_last.pdf.

Про схвалення Державної стратегії управління лісами України до 2035 року: Розпорядження Кабінету Міністрів України від 29.12.2021 р. № 1777-р. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1777-2021-%D1%80#n369.

Вебсайт Державного підприємства «Ліси України». URL: https://e-forest.gov.ua.

Про затвердження Методики визначення шкоди та збитків, заподіяних лісовому фонду внаслідок збройної агресії Російської Федерації: Наказ Міністерства захисту довкілля та природних ресурсів України від 05.12.2022 р. № 414. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1308-22#Text.

Про охорону, захист, використання та відтворення лісів України в особливий період: Рішення Ради національної безпеки і оборони України від 29.09.2022 р. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/n0015525-22#Text.

Mohammed J., Kofi Osei-Fosu A., Yusif H. Factors influencing households’ participation in forest management in the northern region of Ghana. Independent Journal of Management & Production. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 4. Pp. 1324–1340. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v8i4.631.

References

Stativka, N., & Lialina, N. (2017). Formation of the organizational-economic mechanism of agricultural enterprises energy efficiency. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 3(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2017.03.02.05.

Tretiak, V., & Kapinos, N. (2022), The concept and essence of environmental protection land use in the system of public relations. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 5, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2022.5.28.

Borodina, O. (2022). Basic trends of postwar transformation of Ukraine’s economy: industry 4.0, budgetary decentralization, regional energy management. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 6(1), 04. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2022.06.01.04.

Celani de Macedo, A., Cantore, N., Barbier, L., Matteini, M., & Pasqualetto, G. (2020). The impact of industrial energy efficiency on economicand social indicators. FEEM Working Paper, 1. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3654037.

Lu, C-C., Lin, I-F., Wu, D., & Zhang, X. (2021). The effect of forestry on energy efficiency in EU countries: a nonoriented dynamic slack-based data envelopment analysis. Energy Science Engineering, 9(8), 1148–1159. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.879.

Pryshliak, N. (2019). Biogas production in individual biogas digesters: experience of India and prospects for Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 5(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2019.05.01.08.

Giraudet, L.-G., & Missemer, A. (2019). The economics of energy efficiency, a historical perspective. Working Papers halshs-02301636, HAL. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/halshs-02301636.html.

Kalyuzhna, O., Pushkarevskyi, A., & Khyzhniak, D. (2017). Foreign experience in the use of energy-saving technologies in agriculture. Modern Economics, 6, 78–84. Available at: https://modecon.mnau.edu.ua/zarubizhnyi-dosvid-vykorystannia-enerhozberihaiuchykh-tekhnolohii.

Johansson, J., & Ranius, Th. (2019). Biomass outtake and bioenergy development in Sweden: the role of policy and economic presumptions. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 34(8), 771–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2019.1691645.

Eggers, J., Melin, Y., Lundström, J., Bergström, D., & Öhman, K. (2020). Management strategies for wood fuel harvesting – trade-offs with biodiversity and forest ecosystem services. Sustainability, 12(10), 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104089.

Dorohan-Pysarenko, L., Rębilas, R., Yehorova, O., Yasnolob, I., & Kononenko, Z. (2021). Methodological peculiarities of probability estimation of bankruptcy of agrarian enterprises in Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 7(2), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2021.07.02.02.

Al Sharari, F., Yemelyanov, O., Dziurakh, Yu., Sokil, O., & Danylovych, O. (2022). The energy-saving projects’ impact on the level of an enterprise’s financial stability. Economic Annals-XXI, 195(1–2), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V195-04.

Kostyrko, L., Kostyrko, R., Sereda, O., & Chernodubova, E. (2021). Financial support of sustainable development of enterprises in the conditions of economic and ecological imperatives. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(39), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i39.241295.

Shuplat, O., Shevchenko, V., Lutsiv, N., Nekrasov, S., & Hovda, H. (2022). Financing the fixed assets reproduction of woodworking enterprises: innovation and investment aspect. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(45), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.45.2022.3801.

Dmytrenko, A., Furmanchuk, O., Kravchenko, O., Karpenko, Y., Koba, O., & Aiyedogbon, J. O. (2022). Macroeconomic analysis and forecasting of foreign direct investment inflow: evidence from Ukraine. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(47), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.6.47.2022.3926.

Onegina, V., & Vitkovskyi, Y. (2020). Investments and land reform in agriculture of Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 6(4), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.04.10.

Plastun, A., Yelnikova, Y., Shelyuk, A., Vorontsova, A., & Artemenko, A. (2020). The role of public investment policy and responsible investment in sustainable development financing. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 6(2), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.02.07.

Kucher, L., Kucher, A., Morozova, H., & Pashchenko, Y. (2022). Development of circular agricultural economy: potential sources of financing innovative projects. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 8(2), 206–227. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2022.08.02.11.

Centrum Koordynacji Projektów Środowiskowych (2023). Lasy Węglowe. Available at: https://www.ckps.lasy.gov.pl/projekty-energetyczne-lp.

Material- und Energieeffizienz (2023). Available at: https://www.charta-fuer-holz.de/charta-handlungsfelder/material-und-energieeffizienz.

Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2017). Оrder of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine «On the approval of the Energy Strategy of Ukraine for the period until 2035 «Security, energy efficiency, competitiveness». Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/605-2017-%D1%80#Text.

State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2023). Capital Investments. Available at: http://ukrstat.gov.ua.

Low-carbon development strategy of Ukraine until 2050 (2018). Available at: https://razumkov.energy/files/docs/Proekt/LEDS_ua_last.pdf.

Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2021). Оrder of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine «On the approval of the State Forest Management Strategy of Ukraine until 2035». Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1777-2021-%D1%80#n369.

Website of the State Enterprise «Forests of Ukraine» (n.d.). Available at: https://e-forest.gov.ua.

Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine (2022). Order of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine «On the approval of the Methodology for determining damage and losses caused to the forest fund as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation». Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1308-22#Text.

National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine (2022). Decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine «About protection, protection, use and reproduction of forests of Ukraine in a special period». Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/n0015525-22#Text.

Mohammed, J., Kofi Osei-Fosu, A., & Yusif, H. (2017). Factors influencing households’ participation in forest management in the northern region of Ghana. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 8(4), 1324–1340. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v8i4.631.

Published
2023-06-20
How to Cite
Drebot, O., Palianychko, N., Vysochanska, M., Sakharnatska, L., & Gadzalo, A. (2023). Influence of energy efficiency of forestry enterprises on forestry land use indicators. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 9(2), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2023.09.02.05
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)