Adaptive institutional change in municipal waste management

Keywords: municipal waste, institutional change, economic (fiscal) decisions, waste management.


Purpose. The paper proposes a new trajectory of institutional change that integrates economic (fiscal) and technical solutions in managing municipal waste.

Methodology / approach. The study adopts a model for the study of institutional change. A retrospective, quantitative analysis of institutional change, a legal-historical analysis of formal institutions, and a comparative-institutional analysis are used to substantiate the link between municipal waste quantities and Gross domestic product (GDP) growth. Using correlation and regression analysis, we examine the relationship between institutional change in municipal waste management and recycling.

Results. The study proves the impact of institutional change on municipal waste management in the EU and Bulgaria. It can change the relationship between GDP and the amount of waste and stimulate the implementation of more efficient and innovative waste management methods. The relationship between institutional change in municipal waste management are studied. The main idea is that more legal acts regulating municipal waste management and a higher human development index, wich reflects better and more efficient municipal waste management, will lead to higher recycling rates. The study discusses how institutional change aimed at effective municipal waste management can contribute to increased revenues and reduced costs for the government by promoting innovation in the sector, introducing more efficient waste collection and treatment technologies, and encouraging recycling.

Originality / scientific novelty. The study highlights the lack of a unified direction in rules and policies for municipal waste management in Bulgaria and its impact on the systems efficiency. It aims to present a new approach to solving the problems related to municipal waste management in Bulgaria that focuses on the importance of institutional change.

Practical value / implications. The paper identifies differences between the municipal waste management systems in the EU and Bulgaria. The proposed financial and technical solutions help central and municipal administrations to create new institutions. These actions can be joint and better coordinated. All this should lead to changes in the regulatory framework. The new rules will contribute to stability and less need to change regulations, clarity for individuals and organisations to the optimal solutions for reducing municipal waste costs, and pressureon the central and local administration to take the necessary actions for such a change.


MEW (2021). National Waste Management Plan 2021–2028. Available at:

Dochin, K., Kuneva, V., & Iliev, I. (2017). Principal component analysis of the phytoplankton interactions with the environmental factors in two reservoirs in Bulgaria. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 23(6), 1037–1046. Available at:

European Commission (2015). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Closing the loop – an EU action plan for the circular economy. Brussels, Belgium. Available at:

European Environment Agency (2016). Circular economy in Europe: developing the knowledge base. EEA Report No 2/2016.

European Commission (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A new circular economy action plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe. Brussels, Belgium. Available at:

North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Available at:

Cheung, S. (1986). China in transition: where is she heading now? Contemporary Economic Policy, 4(4), 1–11.

Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cause. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. Available at:

Sathye, M. (2008). Estimating the cost of compliance of AMLCTF for financial institutions in Australia. Journal of Financial Crime, 15(4), 347–363.

OECD (2014). OECD Regulatory Compliance Cost Assessment Guidance. OECD Publishing.

Winiecki, J. (2000). Formal rules, informal rules, and economic performance. Acta Oеconomica, 51(2), 147–172.

North, D., & Wallis, J. (1994). Integrating institutional change and technical change in economic history a transaction cost approach. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150(4), 609–624, Available at:

North, D. (1971). Institutional change and economic growth. The Journal of Economic History, 31(1), 118–125. Available at:

Debref, R., Pyka, A., & Morone, P. (2022). For an institutionalist approach to the bioeconomy: innovation, green growth and the rise of new development models. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 38, 1–9.

Ostrom, E. (1994). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Available at:

Hukkinen, J. (1999). Institutions in environmental management: constructing mental models and sustainability. London, New York, Routledge. Available at:

Thabit, Q., Nassour, A., & Nelles, M. (2023). Facts and figures on aspects of waste management in the Middle East and North Africa Region. Waste, 1(1), 52–80.

Huang, Y-T., Pan, T-C., & Kao, J-J. (2011). Performance assessment for municipal solid waste collection in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(4), 1277–1283.

Jacobsen, R., Buysse, J., & Gellynck, X. (2013). Cost comparison between a private and public collection of residual municipal waste: multiple case studies in the Flemish region of Belgium. Waste Management, 33(1), 3–11,

Chaparov, B., & Manolov, T. (2021). Local fee for disposal of municipal waste – in the business in Bulgaria punished? Construction Entrepreneurship and Real Property, 1, 70–74. Available at:

Boskovic, G., Jovicic, N., Jovanovic, S., & Simovic, V. (2016). Calculating the costs of waste collection: a methodological proposal. Waste Management & Research, 34(8), 775–783.

Matheson, T. (2019). Disposal is not free: fiscal instruments to internalize the environmental costs of solid waste. Working Paper No. 2019/283. IMF. Available at:

Iyer, E., & Kashyap, R. (2007). Consumer recycling: role of incentives, information, and social class. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6, 32–47.

Li, C., Huang, Y., & Harder, M. (2017). Incentives for food waste diversion: exploration of a long-term successful Chinese city residential scheme. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 491–499.

Widdowson, S., Maunder, A., & Read, A. (2014). Household recycling incentives – do they work? Proceedings of the 20th WasteCon Conference 6–10 October 2014. Somerset West, Cape Town. Available at:

Yau, Y. (2012). Stakeholder engagement in waste recycling in a high-rise setting. Sustainable Development, 20(2), 115–127.

Chen, Q., & Huang, X., (2018). Government’s role in rural environmental management: an analysis based on policy text. Journal of Hohai University. Philosophy and Social Sciences, 20(1), 54–61.

Awasthi, А. K., Sankar Cheela, V. R., D’Adamo, I., Iacovidou, E., Islam, R., Johnson, M., Miller, T. R., … & Li, G. (2021). Zero waste approach towards sustainable waste management. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 3, 100014.

Steurer, R. (2011). Soft instruments, few networks: how ‘new governance’ materializes in public policies on corporate social responsibility across Europe. Environmental policy and management, 21(4), 270–290.

Lenssen, J., Dentchev, N., & Roger, L. (2014). Sustainability, risk management and governance: towards an integrative approach. Corporate Governance, 14(5), 670–684.

Consolidated version of the Treaty on the European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2012). Official Journal of the European Union, 51, 9. Available at:

European Union Law (n.d.). Normative acts at the EU level related to municipal waste. Available at:

Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on waste (2006). Available at:

Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2018). Available at:

Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives (2008). Available at:

Directive (EU) 2018/850 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste (2018). Available at:

Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste (2006). Available at:

Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programs relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC – Statement by the Commission (2003). Available at:

Environmental Protection Act (n.d). Available at:

Waste Management Act (n.d.). Available at https://

Law on Local Taxes and Fees (n.d.). Available at:

Dimova, D. (2017). Modelling data on taxes and average annual salary in Bulgaria, 17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2017, Bulgaria, 17(21), 463–470.

Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557.

Hagedorn, K., Artz, K., & Peters, U. (2002). Institutional arrangements for environmental co-operatives: a conceptual framework. In K. Hagedorn (Еd.), Environmental cooperation and institutional change: theories and policies for european agriculture (pp. 3–25). Elgar, Cheltenam.

Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. Urban Development Series. Knowledge Papers 15. World Bank, Washington DC. Available at:

Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32.

Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2009). Municipal waste Kuznets curves: evidence on socio-economic drivers and policy effectiveness from the EU. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44, 203–230.

Saha, P., Patil, N. P., & Roy, P. (2017). Municipal solid waste management in Kolkata, India–A review. Waste Management, 63, 14–23.

Wang, Q., Zhang, D., Huang, G., & Chen, X. (2019). Analysis of the relationship between economic growth and municipal solid waste generation in China from 2005 to 2016. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117687.

Zaman, K., Shahbaz, M., Loganathan, N., & Raza, S. (2016). Tourism development, energy consumption and environmental Kuznets curve: trivariate analysis in the panel of developed and developing countries. Tourism Management, 54, 275–283.

Eurostat database (2023). Available at:

Greco, G., Allegrini, A., Del Lungo, C., Gori Savellini, P., & Gabellini, L. (2015). Drivers of solid waste collection. Empirical evidence from Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 364–371.

Tavares, G., Zsigraiova, Z., Semiao, V., & Carvalho, M. G. (2009). Optimization of MSW collection routes for minimum fuel consumption using 3D GIS modelling. Waste Management, 29(3), 1176–1185.

Japan’s Experiences on Waste Management (2022). Available at:

Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste (1999). Available at:

National Statistical Institute of the Republic of Bulgaria (2022). Municipal waste. Аvailavle at:

Bozhikin, I, Gechev, R., & Dentchev, N. (2017). Environmental fiscal policy and other instruments for sustainable and efficient municipal solid waste management: a comparative study of Belgium and Bulgaria. Waste Management, 65, і-іі.

ADEME, RDC Environment, Michel, F., & Standaert, S., & Huppertz, T. (2017). Etude comparative de la taxation sur l’élimination des déchets en Europe. Available at:

Briguglio, M. (2021). Taxing household waste: intended and unintended consequences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 304, 127034.

Thøgersen, J. (2003). Incentives and recycling: behavioral and psychological reactions to a performance-dependent garbage fee. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 197–228.

Bozhikin, I. (2016). Environmental fiscal policy for sustainable development: a comparative study. Accountancy & Bedrijfskunde, 2, 39–51. Available at:

Knickmeyer, D. (2020). Social factors influencing household waste separation: a literature review on best practices to enhance recycling efficiency in urban areas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118605.

Ekere, W., Mugisha, J., & Drake, L. (2009). Factors influencing waste separation and utilization among households in the Lake Victoria crescent, Uganda. Waste Managment, 29(12), 3047–3051,

Kirillova, A., & Musinova, N. (2022). Potential of separate waste collection technologies, Transportation Research Procedia, 63, 1556–1560.

Emmanouil, C., Papadopoulou, K., Papamichael, I., & Zorpas, A. (2022). Pay-as-You-Throw (PAYT) for municipal solid waste management in Greece: on public opinion and acceptance. Sustainability, 14(22), 15429.

Ukkonen, A., & Sahimaa, O. (2021). Weight-based pay-as-you-throw pricing model: encouraging sorting in households through waste fees. Waste Management, 135, 372–380.

Kushwaha, S., Verma, Y., Mayank, S., Eswar, R., Verma, V., & Maurya, A. (2022). Smart garbage monitoring system using IoT and cloud computing. IEEE Students Conference on Engineering and Systems (SCES), (pp. 1–6). Prayagraj, India.

Gayathri, N., Divagaran, A., Akhilesh, C., Aswiinq, V., & Charan, N. (2021). IOT based smart waste management system. 7th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), (pp. 2042–2046). Coimbatore, India.

Malapur, B., & Pattanshetti, V. (2017). IoT based waste management: an application to smart city. 2017 International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS), (pp. 2476–2486). Chennai, India.

How to Cite
Georgiev, M., Georgieva, V., & Blagoeva, N. (2023). Adaptive institutional change in municipal waste management. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 9(3), 5-28.