Ecological optimisation of vegetable production as a factor of the industry capitalisation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2025.11.01.03Keywords:
efficiency, environmental sustainability, economy, fertility, vegetable production.Abstract
Purpose. The paper aims to present the concept and methodology for identifying ecologically and economically consistent parameters of production processes in vegetable growing.
Methodology / approach. The research methodology assumes that crop production efficiency can be assessed by the carbon balance, where such a balance can have a specific economic expression as one of the efficiency criteria. The above is proposed to be carried out on the basis of the authors’ approach to assessing ecologically and economically consistent parameters of production processes in vegetable growing by the dynamics and balance of soil organic matter (humus).
Results. The paper presents the results of the study of environmental problems of modern vegetable production, which provided the basis for a new interpretation of productivity, costs, efficiency, and balance of the industry. This interpretation was carried out on the basis of actual material on the industry operation in Ukraine as a whole and on the example of individual enterprises of the Vinnytsia region. On this basis, a complex – ecological and economic – criterion of production efficiency was proposed, as well as possible ways to solve the problem of environmental risks through the formation of a special type of management. One of the results was the empirical reflection of the processes of using and reproducing fertility as a capital-forming factor of long-term investment action in industry models.
Originality / scientific novelty. For the first time, a description of the dynamics of Ukrainian vegetable production over the last 35 years was carried out as a separate, original model based on the following variables: productivity, manufacturability (costs and payback of fertilisers), weighted average indicators of annual mineralisation and humification, as well as the general balance of reproducing soil fertility in the production process. This model allows for the assessment of industry environmental risks and the justification of recommendations on the possibility of their minimisation. For the first time, the parameters of the positive impact of the transition to a market model of vegetable production were described using the criterion of soil fertility reproduction.
Practical value / implications. Assessment, modelling, and forecasting of ecologically and economically consistent parameters of production processes in vegetable growing, in addition to scientific interest, is considered as a direct tool for maximising the efficiency of the vegetable market as a whole. In particular, the proposed approach is the basis for substantiating the structure (ratio of crops) and parameters (fertilisation, productivity, costs, efficiency) of vegetable production within the defined limitations of environmental management.
References
Medvediev, V. V. (Ed.) (1992). Rodiuchist hruntiv: monitorynh ta upravlinnia [Soil fertility: monitoring and management]. Kyiv, Urozhai.
Moroz, O. V. (1997). Enerhetychna evoliutsiia silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy [Energy evolution of agriculture of Ukraine]. Kyiv, IAE UAAS.
Baliuk, S. A., Nosko, B. S., & Skrylnyk, E. V. (2016). Modern problems of biological degradation of black earth and ways of preserving their fertility. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 94(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201601-02.
Medvedovskyi, O. K., & Ivanenko, P. I. (1988). Enerhetychnyi analiz intensyvnykh tekhnolohii v silskohospodarskomu vyrobnytstvi [Energy analysis of intensive technologies in agricultural production]. Kyiv, Urozhai.
Saiko, A. F., Malienko, A. M., & Mazur, G. A. (1993). Stalist zemlerobstva: problemy i shliakhy vyrishennia [Sustainability of agriculture: problems and solutions], 2nd ed. Kyiv, Urozhai.
Skrylnyk, Ye. V., Kutova, A. M., Filimonchuk, Y. S., & Moskalenko, V. P. (2015). Influence of anthropogenous factors on humus state and content of nutrients in typical black earth. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 93(9), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201509.
Tsiafouli, M. A., Thébault, E., Sgardelis, S. P., de Ruiter, P. C., van der Putten, W. H., Birkhofer, K., Hemerik, L., … & Hedlund, K. (2015). Intensive agriculture reduces soil biodiversity across Europe. Global Change Biology, 21(2), 973–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12752.
Wright, A. L., Dou, F., & Hons, F. M. (2007). Crop species and tillage effects on carbon sequestration in subsurface soil. Soil Science, 172(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31802d11eb.
Panday, D., & Maharjan, B. (2018). Yield response and ammonia volatilization in variably irrigated corn in western Nebraska. In Proceedings of Great Plains Soil Fertility Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, 6–7 March 2018, vol. 17, pp. 162–168. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323655719.
Ye, R., Wright, A. L., Inglett, K., Wang, Y., Ogram, A. V., & Reddy, K. R. (2009). Land-use effects on soil nutrient cycling and microbial community dynamics in the everglades agricultural area, Florida. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 40(17–18), 2725–2742. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620903173772.
Postma-Blaauw, M. B., de Goede, R. G. M., Bloem, J., Faber, J. H., & Brussaard, L. (2010). Soil biota community structure and abundance under agricultural intensification and extensification. Ecology, 91(2), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0666.1.
Wagg, C., Bender, S. F., Widmer, F., & van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2014). Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 111(14), 5266–5270. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320054111.
Bavec, M., Turneki, M., Štraus, S., Narodoslawsky, M., Robacer, M., Grobelnik Mlakar, S., Jacop, M., & Bavec, F. (2014). Ecological footprint as a method for evaluation different agriculture production systems. Proceedings of the 4th ISOFAR Scientific Conference “Building Organic Bridges”, at the Organic World Congress 2014, 13–15 October, Istanbul, Turkey. Available at: https://orgprints.org/id/eprint/23950/1/23950%20Bavec%20et%20al%20owc2014%20Istanbul_MM.pdf.
Scuderi, A., Timpanaro, G., Branca, F., & Cammarata, M. (2023). Economic and environmental sustainability assessment of an innovative organic broccoli production pattern. Agronomy, 13(3), 624. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030624.
Asgharipour, M. R., Amiri, Z., & Campbell, D. E. (2020). Evaluation of the sustainability of four greenhouse vegetable production ecosystems based on an analysis of emergy and social characteristics. Ecological Modelling, 424, 109021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109021.
Tamburini, E., Pedrini, P., Marchetti, M. G., Fano, E. A., & Castaldelli, G. (2015). Life cycle based evaluation of environmental and economic impacts of agricultural productions in the mediterranean area. Sustainability, 7(3), 2915–2935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7032915.
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418, 671–677.
Yang, B., Banerjee, S., Herzog, C., Ramírez, A. C., Dahlin, P., & van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2021). Impact of land use type and organic farming on the abundance, diversity, community composition and functional properties of soil nematode communities in vegetable farming. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 318, 107488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107488.
Maraseni, T., & Kodur, S. (2019). Improved prediction of farm nitrous oxide emission through an understanding of the interaction among irrigation, climate extremes and soil nitrogen dynamics. Journal of Environmental Management, 248, 109278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109278.
Scarlato, M., Dogliotti, S., Bianchi, F. J. J. A., Rossing, W. A. H. (2022). Ample room for reducing agrochemical inputs without productivity loss: the case of vegetable production in Uruguay. Science of The Total Environment, 810, 152248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152248.
Laborde, D., Mamun, A., Martin, W., Piñeiro, V., & Vos, R. (2021). Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions. Nature Communications, 12, 2601. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22703-1.
Zhang, F., Liu, F., Ma, X., Guo, G., Liu, B., Cheng, T., Liang, T., & … Wang, X. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from vegetables production in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 317, 128449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128449.
Lu, Y.-X., Wang, S.-T., Yao, G.-X., & Xu, J. (2023). Green total factor efficiency in vegetable production: a comprehensive ecological analysis of China’s practices. Agriculture, 13(10), 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ agriculture13102021.
Martin-Gorriz, B., Gallego-Elvira, B., Martínez-Alvarez, V., Maestre-Valero, J. F. (2020). Life cycle assessment of fruit and vegetable production in the region of Murcia (South-East Spain) and evaluation of impact mitigation practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121656.
Vyshnevska, O. M., & Lesik, I. M. (2017). Infrastrukturne zabezpechennia formuvannia i funktsionuvannia rynku produktsii ovochivnytstva [Infrastructural support for the formation and functioning of the vegetable production market]. Mykolaiv, FOP Shvets V. M.
Rud, V. P. (2014). Vegetable market. Food safety aspects of Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series “Economic Sciences”, 5(1), 252–255. Available at: http://www.ej.kherson.ua/journal/economic_05/62.pdf.
Skupskyi, R. M. (2013). Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichni zasady innovatsiinoho rozvytku promyslovoho ovochivnytstva v ahrarnykh pidpryiemstvakh [Organizational and economic bases of innovative development of industrial vegetable growing in agricultural enterprises], Kherson, Hrin D. S.
Ulianchenko, O. V., Bezus, R. M. (2016). Challenges and trends of production organic vegetable and fruit in Ukraine. Visnyk KhNAU. Series: Economic Sciences, 2, 23–32. Available at: https://journal-met.kh.ua/visn_econom_2016_2_23.html.
Lohosha, R., Prylutskyi, A., Pronko, L., & Kolesnyk, T. (2023). Organization of the system of internal marketing and marketing of interaction of agricultural enterprises for the production of biodiesel based on value chain analysis. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 14(3(67)), 823–841. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v14.3(67).21.
Lohosha, R., Krychkovskyi, V., Moroz, Y., Kolesnyk, T., & Vakar, T. (2024). Methodology and engineering of a sustainable market model. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 13(1), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2024.v13n1p306.
Kaletnik, G., Pryshliak, N., Khvesyk, M., & Khvesyk, J. (2022). Institutional capacity building on waste management as a secondary resource in Ukraine on the path to European integration. Polityka Energetyczna, 25(3), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.33223/epj/153932.
Tokarchuk, D., Pryshliak, N., Shynkovych, A., & Mazur, K. (2021). Strategic potential of agricultural waste as a feedstock for biofuels production in Ukraine. Rural Sustainability Research, 46(341), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/plua-2021-0012.
Lohosha, R. V., Pidvalna, O. H., & Krychkovskyi, V. Yu. (2018). Methodology and methods of evaluation of processes of the use and reproduction of soil fertility in vegetable growing. Business Inform, 10, 177–187. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/binf_2018_10_28.
Logosha, R. V. (2018). Development of the vegetable products market in Ukraine: theory, methodology, practice (DrS Thesis). Zhytomyr, ZNAU. Available at: https://nrat.ukrintei.ua/searchdoc/0518U000527.
State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Statistical information. Available at: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
Levin, V. I. (1977). Amount of plant residues of field crops and its determination according to the yield of the main product. Agrokhimiya, 8, 36–42.
Batsula, O. O., Holovachov, Ie. A., & Derevianko, R. H. (1987). Zabezpechennia bezdefitsytnoho balansu humusu v grunti [Providing no deficit balance of humus in the soil]. Urozhai, Kyiv.
Medvedev, V. V. (2015). Land reform and soil fertility. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 5, 73–79. Available at: https://agrovisnyk.com/pdf/ua_2015_05_17.pdf.
Semtsov, V. M. (2017). Unobservable economic processes in the sphere of foreign trade: institutional aspects. Economic Space, 117, 40–55. Available at: http://srd.pdaba.edu.ua:8080/bitstream/123456789/519/1/Sentsov.pdf.
Kaletnik, G., & Lutkovska, S. (2020). Strategic priorities of the system modernization environmental safety under sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, XI(5(45), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v11.5(45).10.
Gontaruk, Y., Kolomiiets, T., Honcharuk, I., & Tokarchuk, D. (2024). Production and use of biogas and biomethane from waste for climate neutrality and development of green economy. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 25(2), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/175876.
Molotoks, A., Smith, P., & Dawson, T. P. (2021). Impacts of land use, population, and climate change on global food security. Food and Energy Security, 10(1), e261. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.261.
Kaletnik, G., Honcharuk, I., & Okhota, Y. (2020). The waste-free production development for the energy autonomy formation of Ukrainian agricultural enterprises. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, XI(3(43), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v11.3(43).02.
Dhiman, V. (2020). Organic farming for sustainable environment. Review of existed policies and suggestions for improvement. International Journal of Research and Review,7(2), 20–31. Available at: https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.7_Issue.2_Feb2020/IJRR005.pdf.
