METHODICAL BASES OF FASTPLANT-TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE FAST PRODUCTION OF NICHE CULTURES


  • Sergey Volodin Institute of Innovation Providing
Keywords: fastplant-technology, fastplant-system, niche cultures, niche market, business-prime-method, fastplantagro, co-production, ahrotehnopolis, projects of knowledge-intensive business.

Abstract

Conceptual ideas and methodical approaches to the creation of fastplant-technologies for a rapid development and production of niche cultures are formulated in the article for the first time, specifics of their adaptation to the market conditions, adaptation to the conditions of implementation in the system of artificial modular productions placed on the scientific and production basis of cluster unions of the production of competitive niche products. The principles of selecting the components of the fastplant-system, the designation of elements of the modular design of co-production of niche cultures are given. The features of fastplant-technologies, their structure, methodical recommendations for scientific institutions, in relation to the formation of the commercial type technological proposals for introduction into innovative and investment-active segments of the niche market are determined. In this paper the terminology regarding to the concepts definitions of niche cultures, niche products, niche market, results of  testing and analysis methods development and forecasting a niche cultures (products) market, creation of a production self-regulation that depends on commercial conditions, social needs state and society based on a market private partnership market system.

The seasonal fluctuations of demand for niche crops are analyzed, in this connection the principles of creation a market-oriented technologies and mobile production complexes, which provide conditions for a rapid response to the  market  demand fluctuations and the deployment of production in the required volumes and quality in the short windows of the off-season, are proposed.

It is proved that the main problem of the fastplant-technology creation is that the outgoing scientific developments, which are transforming into selection-technological and industrial innovations, have a low coefficient of a commercial ability. Scientific institutions mostly do not possess market-oriented process methods of creation and promotion competitive scientific and innovative products to consumers.

Innovations developed by consulting companies are more adapted to the harsh market conditions, and therefore more understandable to agribusiness.

The research presents methodical approaches and regulatory and organizational tools for the preparation of commercial proposals by scientific institutions, on the basis of which the fastplant-technology is created and projects of their use in the science-intensive niche business.

References

Список використаних джерел

Володін С. А. Реалізація інноваційного потенціалу аграрної науки: проблеми і перспективи / С. А. Володін // Економіка АПК. – 2011. – № 7 – С. 139–150.

Трансфер інноваційних технологій в агропромислове виробництво регіонів України / Я. М. Гадзало, А. В. Балян, С. А. Володін [та ін.]. – К. : Аграрна наука, 2016. – 244 с.

Тимофеев Д. В. Динамика экономического эффекта в процессе управления жизненным циклом инноваций при их коммерциализации / Д. В. Тимофеев // Бізнес Інформ. – 2017. – № 1. – С. 56–60.

Innovation systems and knowledge communities in the agriculture and agrifood sector: a literature review / J. Touzard, L. Temple, G. Faure, B. Triomphe // Journal of Innovation Economics & Management. – 2015. – № 17 (2). – Pp. 117–142. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.017.0117.

Механізм реалізації Програми інноваційно-інвестиційного розвитку НААН на ринкових засадах у 2017 р. [Електронний ресурс] : Постанова президії НААН України № 22 від 22.12.2016 р. – Режим доступу : http://www.iipnaan.com.ua/10-ukr/stratehiia/104-postanova-prezydii-naan-vid-22122016-roku-protokol-22.html.

Карасьова Н. А. Експортна перспектива нішевої продукції для малих та середніх підприємств аграрного сектора / Н. А. Карасьова // Агросвіт. – 2017. – № 1–2. – С. 14–18.

Compositional dynamics of multilevel innovation platforms in agricultural research for development / D. Lamers, M. Schut, L. Klerkx, P. van Asten // Science and Public Policy. – 2017. – Vol. 0. – № 0. – Pp. 1–14 https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx009.

Hermans F. Scale dynamics of grassroots innovations through parallel pathways of transformative change / F. Hermans, D. Roep, L. Klerkx // Ecological Economics. – 2016. – № 130. – Pp. 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.011.

Schut M. Do Mature Innovation Platforms Make a Difference in Agricultural Research for development? A Meta-analysis of Case Studies [Electronic resource] / M. Schut, J.-J. Cadilhon, M. Misiko, I. Dror // Experimental Agriculture. – 2016. – Pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479716000752.

Руденко Г. Р. Особливості впровадження інновацій у діяльність сільськогосподарських підприємств / Г. Р. Руденко // Бізнес Інформ. – 2015. – № 5. – С. 128–132.

References

Volodin, S. A. (2011), Implementing innovative capacity of agricultural science: problems and prospects. Economy AIC, vol. 7, pp. 139–150.

Hadzalo, Y. M., Balyan, A. V. and Volodin, S. A. (2016), Transfer innovatsiynykh tekhnolohiy v ahropromyslove vyrobnytstvo rehioniv Ukrayiny [Transfer of innovative technologies in agricultural production regions of Ukraine] Ahrarna nauka, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Tymofeev, D. V. (2017), The dynamics of economic benefit in the management of the lifecycle of innovation with commercialization. Business Inform, vol. 1, pp. 56–60.

Touzard, J., Temple, L., Faure, G. and Triomphe, B. (2015), Innovation systems and knowledge communities in the agriculture and agrifood sector: a literature review. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 17(2), pp. 117–142. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.017.0117.

Presidium of NAAS of Ukraine (2016), Resolution of the Presidium of NAAS of Ukraine «Program implementation mechanism innovation and investment development NAAS on market principles in 2017», available at: http://www.iipnaan.com.ua/10-ukr/stratehiia/104-postanova-prezydii-naan-vid-22122016-roku-protokol-22.html.

Karasova, N. A. (2017), Export prospects of niche products for small and medium agricultural enterprises. Agrosvit, vol. 1–2, pp. 14–18.

Lamers D., Schut M., Klerkx L., van Asten P. (2017), Compositional dynamics of multilevel innovation platforms in agricultural research for development. Science and Public Policy, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx009.

Hermans, F., Roep, D. and Klerkx, L. (2016), Scale Dynamics of Grassroots Innovations Through Parallel Pathways of Transformative Change. Ecological Economics, no. 130, pp. 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.011.

Cadilhon, J.-J., Misiko, M. and Dror, I. (2016), Do Mature Innovation Platforms Make a Difference in Agricultural Research for development? A Meta-analysis of Case Studies. Experimental Agriculture, pp. 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479716000752.

Rudenko, H. R. (2015), Features of innovation activity in agricultural enterprises. Business Inform, vol. 5, pp. 128–132.

Published
2017-12-20
How to Cite
Volodin, S. (2017). METHODICAL BASES OF FASTPLANT-TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE FAST PRODUCTION OF NICHE CULTURES. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 3(4), 43-56. Retrieved from https://are-journal.com/index.php/are/article/view/134
Section
Articles