The value added chain in the mechanism of public-private partnership for the development of the land use economy of rural territories


Keywords: sustainable development, public welfare, program approach, value chain, rural territories, land use.

Abstract

https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.305556

Purpose. The aims of this paper are (i) to explore public-private partnerships as a tool for economic development of rural economies in developing countries and countries with economies in transition in order to ensure sustainable use of nature and increase public welfare of rural communities through the added value chain; (ii) to develop proposals for the implementation of public-private partnerships on land management and land use in Ukraine.

Methodology / approach. The methodological approach involves study of the world’s PPP practice in land management and land use (including the use of land in forestry), study of the connections between PPP projects and scientific approaches to the concept of sustainable development and the added value chain, as well as analysis of domestic scientific bibliography, which relate to the subject of this study.

Results. The authors found that the declared priorities of the Agenda for Sustainable Development until 2030 require the application of integrated approaches. In particular, the programme in the mechanism of sustainable development management in the form of PPP to ensure sustainable use of nature and increase the social welfare of rural communities. Because the programme approach here involves investing in natural resources and environmental protection and should cover the entire value chain, which directly or indirectly affects the efficiency of natural rural assets, as well as the use and application of innovative technologies.

Originality / scientific novelty. It is substantiated that progress in achieving the declared priorities, in particular in the field of environmental protection, growth of public rural welfare, etc. is possible only in a combination of strengths of all PPP partners, which will eliminate the shortcomings and weaknesses of rural communities. In contrast to existing approaches to the development of the land use economy of rural territories, the basis of the synergy of the parties to PPP is a special natural resource – land, which performs environmental, economic, legal and socio-cultural functions, and determines the form and content, which actually builds sustainable development, including rural. A wide range of PPP forms has been further developed, varying in the degree of involvement and risk taken by the private party in relation to the development of the land use economy of rural territories. The approach to the value chains organization in the development of PPP projects on land management and land use and providing security of land use in terms of taking into account the land use of farmers, formed on different rights, has been improved. The author’s project PPP in the production of pellets a private investor in lumber logging waste provided by some state-owned enterprise both subject to the extension of the moratorium and without its effect is developed.

Practical value / implications. The authors’ research shows that the introduction of the value chain in the mechanism of public-private partnership will lead to significant effective changes in the development of the land use economy, in particular of rural territories. Namely, with the use of appropriate policies it will ensure the provision of sustainable use of natural resources and growth of public welfare, in particular rural communities. This approach allows to involve all stakeholders (government, community, business) for effective management of natural assets in general and agriculture in particular and will increase their level of capitalization and investment attractiveness.

References

1. Arndt, K., Kormier, K. and Ryazanov, E. (2005), Value added chain management and rural poverty reduction: project experience in Kyrgyzstan. Project «Local Market Development». Kyrgyzstan, available at: https://docplayer.ru/31229891-Upravlenie-cepochkoy-dobavlennoy-stoimosti-i-preodolenie-bednosti-v-selskoy-mestnosti-opyt-proekta-v-kyrgyzstane.html.
2. Bondar, O. (2018), Public administration in the field of land use and protection and state land policy in Ukraine: problems of correlation. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 4, is. 3, pр. 22–27. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-3-22-27.
3. Cui, F. and Liu, G. (2018), Global value chains and production networks: case studies of Siemens and Huawei. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
4. Delmon, J. J. (2010), Understanding options for public-private partnerships in infrastructure: sorting out the forest from the trees: BOT, DBFO, DCMF, concession, lease ... Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 5173, World Bank Washington, DC, available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/999661468323693635/Understanding-options-for-public-private-partnerships-in-infrastructure-sorting-out-the-forest-from-the-trees-BOT-DBFO-DCMF-concession-lease.
5. European Investment Bank (2018), Agriculture and Bioeconomy Programme Loan, available at: http://www.eib.org/attachments/thematic/agriculture_and_bioeconomy_factsheet_en.pdf.
6. Farquharson, E., Torres de Mästle, C., and Yescombe, E. R. (2010), How to engage the private sector in public-private partnerships in emerging markets. The World Bank, Washington DC, USA.
7. Frone, S. and Frone, D. F. (2013), Public-Private Partnerships as Mechanisms for Risk Management in the Water Sector. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 103–110.
8. Hamulczuk, M., Makarchuk, O. and Sica, E. (2019), Searching for Market Integration: Evidence from Ukrainian and European Union rapeseed markets. Land Use Policy, vol. 87, 104078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104078.
9. Hermans, F., Geerling-Eiff, F., Potters, J. and Klerkx, L. (2019), Public-Private Partnerships as Systemic Agricultural Innovation Policy Instruments –Assessing Their Contribution to Innovation System Function Dynamics. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, vol. 88, pp. 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2018.10.001.
10. Ho, K. L. P., Nguyen, C. N., Adhikari, R., Miles, M. P., and Bonney, L. (2018), Exploring Market Orientation, Innovation, and Financial Performance in Agricultural Value Chains in Emerging Economies. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 3, is. 3, pp. 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.03.008.
11. Ho, K. L. P., Nguyen, C. N., Adhikari, R., Miles, M. P., and Bonney, L. (2019), Leveraging innovation knowledge management to create positional advantage in agricultural value chains. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 4, is. 2, pp. 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.08.001.
12. Hreshchuk, H. (2019), Efficiency of Land Management Provision of Sustainable Land Use of Agricultural. Scientific Papers Series «Management, economic engineering in agriculture and rural development», vol. 19, is. 3, pр. 275–280.
13. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, World Bank, Asian Development Bank, and Inter-American Development Bank (2014), Public-Private Partnership Reference Guide: version 2, available at: https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/library/public-private-partnerships-reference-guide-version-20.
14. Khvesyk, M. A. et al. (2013), Formuvannia modeli upravlinnia pryrodnymy resursamy v rynkovykh umovakh hospodariuvannia [Formation of a natural resource management model in a market economy conditions], PI IEESD NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
15. Kruhlov, V. V. and Tereshchenko, D. A. (2019), Public-private partnership as tool for developing regional labor potential. Science and Innovation, vol. 15, is. 6, pp. 5–13. https://doi.org/10.15407/scin15.06.005.
16. Levochkin, M. (2016), Problems of public-private partnership in Ukraine and ways of solving them. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 2, is. 2, pp. 85–91. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2016-2-2-85-91.
17. Malek, Ž., Tieskens, K. F. and Verburg, P. H. (2019), Explaining the global spatial distribution of organic crop producers. Agricultural systems, vol. 176, 102680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102680.
18. Mazur, K. and Tomashuk, I. (2020), Governance and regulation as an indispensable condition for developing the potential of rural areas. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 5, is. 5, pр. 67–78. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-5-67-78.
19. Mishra, P. K. and Dey, K. (2018), Governance of agricultural value chains: coordination, control and safeguarding. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 64, pp. 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.09.020.
20. Popov, A. (2016), The formation of institutional environment of agricultural land consolidation in Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 1, is. 2, pр. 128–134. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2015-1-2-128-134.
21. Raschio, G. (2017), Land value chains. Global land outlook working paper, UNCCD, available at: https://knowledge.unccd.int/sites/default/files/2018-06/7.%20Land%2BValue%2BChains__G_Raschio.pdf.
22. Rogito, J. M., Makhanu, E., Mombinya, B. K. and Nyamota, G. (2020), Relationship between access to financial services and youth involvement in agricultural value chains in Kakamega county, Kenya. Agricultural and Resource Economics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 24–36, available at: https://are-journal.com.
23. Rose, D. C. et al. (2019), Integrated farm management for sustainable agriculture: lessons for knowledge exchange and policy. Land Use Policy, vol. 81, pp. 834–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.001.
24. Șargo, A. and Timofti, E. (2017), Public-private partnerships – financing instrument of the mechanism of economic growth and development of the agricultural sector. Scientific Papers Series «Management, economic engineering in agriculture and rural development», vol. 17, is. 1, pp. 381–386.
25. Savchuk, O. O. and Liubchych, A. M. (2019), Legislative framework for the deveopment of innovative infrastructure of efficient use and protection of land under forest shelter belt plantations. Science and Innovation, vol. 15, is. 3, pр. 5–14. https://doi.org/10.15407/scin15.03.005.
26. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2019), Statistical Yearbook Agriculture of Ukraine for 2018. Kyiv, available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2019/zb/09/Zb_sg_2018%20.pdf.
27. Sturla, A. (2012), Public-Private Partnership as a way to restore forest management. Some evidence from Liguria. L’Italia Forestale e Montana, vol. 67, is. 3, pp. 299–309. https://doi.org/10.4129/ifm.2012.3.08.
28. Tarariko, O. H., Ilienko, T. V., Kuchma, T. L. and Novakovska, I. O. (2019), Satellite agroecological monitoring within the system of sustainable environmental management. Agricultural science and practice, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 18–27. https://doi.org/10.15407/10.15407/agrisp6.01.018.
29. Tretiak, N. A. (2013), Rozvytok systemy upravlinnia zemelnymy resursamy yak ekonomichnoi funktsii vlasnosti na zemliu [Development of land management system as an economic function of land ownership], Grin D. S., Kherson, Ukraine.
30. United Nations (2015), Report of the intergovernmental committee of experts on sustainable development financing, available at: http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/ICESDF_Ru.pdf.
31. United Nations (2016), Tax cooperation platform: an important step towards strengthening international tax cooperation, available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/ru/news/financing/collaboration-on-tax.html.
32. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2008), A Practical Guide to Good Governance in PPPs, UN, Geneva, Switzerland.
33. van der Zanden, E. H., Verburg, P. H., Schulp, C. J. and Verkerk, P. J. (2017), Trade-offs of European agricultural abandonment. Land Use Policy, vol. 62, pp. 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.003.
34. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2005), The Law of Ukraine «On peculiarities of state regulation of entrepreneurial activity related to the sale and export of timber», available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2860-15#Text.
35. Zaharioaie, M. (2012), Appropriate financial instruments for public-private partnership in European union. Procedia Economics and Finance, no. 3, pp. 800–805.
36. Zaloznova, Y., Petrova, I. and Trushkina, N. (2016), The classification of forms of public-private partnership: synthesis foreign and domestic experience. Agricultural and Resource Economics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 88–105, available at: https://are-journal.com.
37. Zapatrina, I. (2018), State support under PPP: new challenges in the context of the un sustainable development goals. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, vol. 13, is. 4, pp. 326–337. https://doi.org/10.21552/epppl/2018/4/10.
38. Zverev, A. A. (2009), Public-Private Partnership: ways to improve the legal framework. Collection of EBRD Articles, vol. 1, 244 p.
Published
2020-09-20
How to Cite
Tretiak, A., Tretiak, V., Sakal, O., Kovalenko, A., Tretiak, N., & Shtogryn, H. (2020). The value added chain in the mechanism of public-private partnership for the development of the land use economy of rural territories. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 6(3), 112-134. Retrieved from https://are-journal.com/index.php/are/article/view/340
Section
Articles